Laserfiche WebLink
implementation of this policy would have an impact on work load, but likely less impact <br />than a comp time policy. And a purchase vacation time benefit would be an additional <br />new employee recruitment tool. Weighing all of those concerns, the committee feels that <br />a purchased vacation time policy provides company benefit that exceeds the work load <br />concerns. The committee recommends the commission adopt a purchased vacation time <br />policy, compliant with Internal Revenue Service rules, allowing employees to purchase <br />up to 40 hours of additional vacation each year. Attached is the proposed Purchase <br />Vacation Time (PVT) language to be included in the Employee Handbook. <br />Work dU ending at 4:001)m — The committee agreed that this is not a wage or benefit <br />consideration; rather, this is an issues to be explored through management and the <br />commission. <br />6. More frequent casual days — The committee agreed that this is also not a wage or benefit <br />consideration for this committee; rather, this is a management opportunity. <br />Team building exercises during office meeting when time allows - The committee agreed <br />that this is also not a wage or benefit consideration for this committee; rather, this is a <br />management opportunity. <br />Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) <br />As previously noted, the committee recommends increasing the lineworker pay group to be <br />consistent with the metro average. For the field, office, and management pay groups, the <br />committee recommends a COLA of 3% for 2019. <br />Benchmarking <br />One of the remaining action items from last year's comprehensive benchmarking work was to <br />look more closely at the Water Operator position. The benchmarking done for the field, office, <br />and manager pay groups was conducted using available salary/wage data through Minnesota <br />Municipal Utilities Association (MMUA) for municipals having both water and electric utilities. <br />From that available MMUA data, the comparison pool was set to include the four municipals <br />immediately larger than ERMU and the four that are immediately smaller. That pool includes: <br />Marshall Municipal Utilities, Hutchinson Utilities, The City of Anoka, Willmar Municipal <br />Utilities, Austin Utilities, The City of Chaska, Shakopee Public Utilities, and Moorhead Public <br />Service. <br />The results of the benchmarking conducted for the Water Operator position was the wage is in <br />line with the comparable market, especially when considering the Utilities Performance Metrics <br />Incentive Compensation (UPMIC) potential and the current on -call stipend and on -call frequency <br />for the position. The committee does not recommend any changes to the Water Operator wage. <br />Health and Vision Insurance <br />As previously communicated to the commission, the 2019 renewal for our health insurance <br />policy was 5%. This was the lowest increase possible through our insurance pool. The committee <br />recommends keeping the employer contribution to the employee's health care accounts (HSAs) <br />at the same levels as 2018. These funding levels were $650 for single and $1985 for family. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />RM <br />