My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.5. SR 05-16-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
05/16/2005
>
6.5. SR 05-16-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:01 AM
Creation date
5/13/2005 8:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/16/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />The City of Elk River is a quickly growing municipality located northwest of Minneapolis, <br />Minnesota. Wastewater generated by the City is treated through processes that include <br />preliminary, primary, secondary treatment, and disinfection. Secondary treatment is <br />accomplished using a trickling filter with provisions for upgrading to activated sludge. <br /> <br />Treated wastewater is discharged to the Mississippi River. The Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency (MPCA) is the regulatory agency responsible for Elk River's National <br />Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The MPCA has classified the <br />Mississippi River as an Outstanding Resource Value Water (ORVW) at the reach to <br />which the City of Elk River discharges. Stricter standards apply to ORVW's to protect <br />the receiving water. The MPCA requires evaluation of alternative discharge and <br />advanced treatment options to ensure protection of the Mississippi River at this reach. <br />Mass loading to the river, with respect to organics and suspended solids, has been fixed <br />since 1984. Effluent loading for five-day, carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand <br />(CBODs) is fixed at 216 pounds per day and total suspended solids (TSS) is fixed at 260 <br />pounds per day. More advanced treatment is needed to meet the mass loading <br />requirements. New permit conditions have been suggested as highly probable by the <br />MPCA. Phosphorus concentrations in the effluent are to be reduced to less than 1 <br />mgP/L, and mercury concentrations are to be reduced to less than 6.9 ng/L. <br /> <br />A facility plan has been prepared to assess the wastewater treatment processes, <br />analyze the sanitary sewer collection system, and provide recommendations for <br />upgrades to meet future flows, loadings and permit requirements for operation through <br />the year 2025. The existing plant was evaluated to determine the condition of the <br />equipment and tanks. Wastewater flow was characterized and future flows and loadings <br />were projected. Three areas of development have been identified for trunk sanitary <br />sewer expansions, and new flows from those areas have been identified. Based on <br />projections, the plant must be capable of treating an average wet weather flow of 3.7 <br />million gallons per day (mgd) with a peak hourly flow of 7.0 mgd. Organic loading to the <br />facility was projected based on typical residential, commercial and government <br />contributions. Industries are major contributors of organics to municipal wastewaters, <br />and a typical industrial contribution was incorporated into the wastewater projections. <br /> <br />A number of upgrades to the facility are needed to ensure successful treatment of <br />increasing wastewater flows in accordance with the anticipated permit requirements. <br />Improvements are needed for preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary <br />treatment, and disinfection. Additionally, a phosphorus removal system is necessary to <br />meet the new 1 mgP/L, and filtration is required to polish the treated wastewater to meet <br />strict requirements for CBODs, TSS, phosphorus, and mercury. <br /> <br />The MPCA mandates a nondegradation review to be performed for treatment facilities <br />that discharge to an ORVW. Alternatives have been evaluated as part of the <br />nondegradation review for Elk River. Advanced treatment processes are a practical <br />option that can be implemented at the treatment facility at a consequential expense. <br />Specifically, sand or membrane filtration are options that would polish the wastewater to <br />meet the requirements for an ORVW. An analysis shows that Elk River wastewater, <br />treated to secondary standards, would have little effect on the Mississippi River with <br />respect to CBODs and TSS due to the high dilution provided by the river. Phosphorus <br /> <br />1-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.