Laserfiche WebLink
Case #18-04 Danielle Scharber—site plan review retaining wall/fence/pool <br /> 1. No concerns or issues with the application as proposed. <br /> Case #P 18-12 <br /> CU 18-15 <br /> EV 18-05 <br /> ZC 18-05 River Walk Apartments / Storage Units <br /> 1. Dedicate ROW and construct cul-de-sac between proposed apartments and the <br /> old Saxton building. (south end of To-Be vacated ROW) <br /> 2. Provide easement over public utilities in the To-Be vacated right-of-way area. <br /> 3. Vacating of this right-of-way would create a situation where PID 75-003-4401 <br /> would not have access to a public street. <br /> 4. Need a formal access easement for the public to access lower lot. <br /> 5. Need to provide drainage easement for slope and grade tie with the lot to the <br /> south(existing Saxton parking lot) <br /> 6. Proposed lot lines should have standard drainage and utility easements dedicated. <br /> 7. Private sewer service should be connected to the sewer line not tied into a <br /> manhole. <br /> 8. Elevations on the sanitary sewer system are incorrect. <br /> 9. ERMU desires all water piping to be DIP not C-900 <br /> 10. <br /> 11. Collect drainage from curbs in driveway located in the To-Be vacated area before <br /> sending to the public street. <br /> 12. Existing CBs on south curb line must be rebuilt. We will not allow adjusting <br /> rings to be built up 2.5+ feet. One of the structures does not line up with curb <br /> line. <br /> 13. Proposed contours should be shown in all areas. <br /> 14. South driveway will not be allowed to drain to the public ROW. <br /> 15. Curbing shall be provided in all areas including the driveway in the To-Be <br /> vacated row area. <br /> 16. Further detail grades on the grass pave area and the entrance to it from the paved <br /> drive lane. <br /> 17. Further detail grades and slopes along the access to lower parking lot. <br /> 18. Errors in grades shown in lower lot. <br /> 19. Need to reestablish the capacity and functionality of the existing storm water <br /> pond below bluff. It seems the proposed access drive is conflicting in location. <br /> 20. No civil/site plans for the storage units have been received or reviewed. <br /> 21. Staff reserves the right to continue review of all site,grading and utility plans. <br /> N:\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\P\P 18-10 Monroe Estates Preliminary Plat\4-Planning <br /> Commission\at\August SPR Memo—Public Works.docx <br />