My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Joint HRA & City Council Meeting 09-04-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2018
>
09-04-2018 SPECIAL JOINT W/HRA
>
Joint HRA & City Council Meeting 09-04-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2018 9:56:30 AM
Creation date
8/31/2018 9:55:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
date
9/4/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River TH 10 and Lowell Redevelopment <br />LHB Project No. 180477 Page 9 of 11 Final Report <br />determine if the total deficiencies warranted “substantial renovation or clearance” based on <br />the criteria we outlined above. <br /> <br />System condition deficiencies are a measurement of defects or substantial deterioration in <br />site elements, structure, exterior envelope, mechanical and electrical components, fire <br />protection and emergency systems, interior partitions, ceilings, floors and doors. <br /> <br />The evaluation of system condition deficiencies was made by reviewing all available <br />information contained in City records, and making interior and exterior inspections of the <br />buildings. LHB only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible upon our <br />inspection of the building or contained in City records. We did not consider the amount <br />of “service life” used up for a particular component unless it was an obvious part of that <br />component’s deficiencies. <br /> <br />After identifying the system condition deficiencies in each building, we used our <br />professional judgment to determine if the list of defects or deficiencies is of sufficient total <br />significance to justify “substantial renovation or clearance.” <br /> <br />FINDING: <br />In our professional opinion, seven (7) out of eight (8) buildings (87.5 percent) in the <br />proposed TIF District are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial <br />renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of <br />deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including <br />adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects <br />or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or <br />clearance. This exceeds the 50 percent requirement of Subdivision 10a(1). <br /> <br />C. DISTRIBUTION OF SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURES <br />Much of this report has focused on the condition of individual buildings as they relate to <br />requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. It is also <br />important to look at the distribution of substandard buildings throughout the geographic <br />area of the proposed TIF District (Diagram 3). <br /> <br />FINDING: <br />The parcels with substandard buildings are reasonably distributed compared to all parcels <br />that contain buildings. The Northwesterly portion of the proposed TIF District does not <br />contain a substandard building, but it has a very small sample size of one structure to <br />evaluate. In addition, the Northwesterly portion of the proposed TIF District has <br />significant area allocated to paved parking lots which also meets the distribution <br />requirements under Subdivision 10. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.