Laserfiche WebLink
The Omnibus Energy Bill. The Omnibus Energy Bill makes several other major changes to the statutory <br /> and regulatory scheme that governs the operation of electric utilities. The Omnibus Energy Bill allows <br /> investor-owned utilities ("IOUs"), with the approval of the PUC, to include in their rates the cost of new <br /> tra smission improvements without going through an expensive general rate case. This authority will <br /> pro ide greater incentive to IOUs to make needed improvements to their transmission systems. <br /> Th Omnibus Energy Bill modifies several State approval processes involving the construction of large <br /> power plants and transmission lines. It transfers the authority for routing transmission lines and siting <br /> power plants from the Environmental Quality Board to the PUC, thereby centralizing the need <br /> certification and the siting processes in one agency. The law eliminates the limits involved in the need <br /> certification and siting processes, provides added criteria to analyze the need for transmission projects, <br /> and eliminates the deadline imposed on the PUC for need certification decisions. <br /> It i., not possible to predict whether the Minnesota State Legislature or Congress will enact further <br /> legi.lation restructuring the electric utility industry or what the substance of any such legislation would be <br /> or hat the effect might be upon the Utility. <br /> En ironmental Matters <br /> The Utility's generation operations are subject to continuing environmental regulation by the U.S. <br /> En ironmental Protection Agency (the "EPA"), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (the "MPCA") <br /> and other regulatory agencies and are in compliance with all regulations. <br /> Fed-ral, state and local standards and rules which regulate the environmental impact of generation and <br /> tr. ,mission facilities used by the Utility are subject to change. These changes may arise from continuing <br /> legi.lative, regulatory and judicial action regarding such standards and rules. Consequently, there is no <br /> ass ance that the asset in operation or contemplated will remain subject to the regulations currently in <br /> effe t, will always be in compliance with future regulations, or will always be able to obtain all required <br /> ope ating permits. An inability to comply with environmental standards could result in a reduced <br /> ope ating level or the complete shutdown of individual electric generating units not in compliance. <br /> Fed-ral legislation and EPA rule-making have had a significant effect on electric utilities. The Clean Air <br /> Act Amendments ("CAA") established requirements to obtain operating permits for an affected facility <br /> whi h set forth emissions limits and other requirements, including monitoring, record keeping and <br /> reporting. The CAA also established a regulatory program to address the effects of acid rain and impose <br /> rest ictions on sulfur dioxide(SO2) and nitrogen oxide(NOx). <br /> The EPA has introduced or proposed in recent years various rules to reduce NOx and SO2 emissions on a <br /> regi nal level to achieve ambient air quality standards, reduce hazardous air pollutants from power plants, <br /> to r duce regional haze and to regulate the disposal and management of coal combustion by-products. <br /> The CAA also requires that the EPA establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards and the regulation <br /> of:reenhouse gases. Revisions to the Clean Water Act Section 316 (a) and(b)may have an impact on the <br /> electric utility industry, but the cost at this time is impossible to estimate. <br /> The Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act currently <br /> are scheduled for reauthorization by Congress. The impact of this legislation on the electric utility <br /> ind I stry is uncertain; however, no new programs related to the electric utility industry are expected. <br /> A n mber of electrical industry and other studies have been conducted regarding the potential long-term <br /> hea th effects resulting from exposure to electromagnetic fields ("EMF") created by transmission and <br /> dist ibution lines and equipment. At this time, any relationship between EMF and certain adverse health <br /> effe is remains inconclusive; however, electric utilities have been experiencing challenges in various <br /> fo s claiming financial damages associated with electric equipment and EMF. At this time, it is not <br /> possible to predict the extent of the cost, if any, and other impacts which the EMF concern may have on <br /> ele tric utilities, including the Utility. Up to this point there have been no claims against the Utility <br /> rela ed to EMF exposure. <br /> - 9- <br /> 18 <br />