My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1e ERMUSR 08-14-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2018
>
08-14-2018
>
6.1e ERMUSR 08-14-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2018 9:14:16 AM
Creation date
8/13/2018 9:06:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/14/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Understanding how EV drivers make decisions about charging American Public Power ... Page 5 of 11 <br /> There are good reasons for employers to do so. For one thing, the presence of EV <br /> charging stations improves the business' image as a forward-looking, sustainable <br /> enterprise. Businesses also may offer charging as an employee benefit. <br /> But Jimenez points out that many obstacles must be overcome before employers <br /> readily embrace EV charging. Capital costs for installation can be high. The employer <br /> might not have the space within a parking lot for the chargers. Moreover, many simply <br /> know little about EVs and how to install chargers. On top of that, administering the <br /> programs creates new work. If there is not a 1:1 ratio of chargers to EVs, who gets to <br /> charge first? Is it first-come, first-served, or should the employer create a schedule for <br /> who charges when? And who pays for the electricity — the employer or the employee? <br /> To help with the cost, SMUD offers customers a S1,500 incentive for each Level 2 <br /> charging station. Business customers can take advantage of the incentive for installing <br /> up to 20 chargers per location. SMUD also offers up to $120,000 for DC fast charging <br /> stations with public access. <br /> EPRI's Dunckley pointed out that EV drivers tend to be clustered in terms of geography. <br /> Often they are centered in high-income areas, not evenly spread out over a service <br /> territory. This will affect how utilities use them in managing load and planning capacity. <br /> "It's something to consider — not necessarily a bad thing, but something to watch for." <br /> Changing fuels and changing habits <br /> How people pay for electric refueling, not just how much they are charged, has an <br /> impact on habits and expectations, a lesson learned by ERMU. <br /> Unlike EV operators, most drivers of gasoline-powered cars fall into common refueling <br /> patterns. One popular habit is to wait until the gas needle hits near full and then "top off" <br /> the tank with two or three clicks (shut-offs) of the pump handle. <br /> Another is to "run on empty," which is the habit of putting just enough gas in the tank to <br /> get you from point A to point B and maybe back again. This is the "pump upon need" <br /> model. <br /> When ERMU studied EV driver behavior, it found some resistance to the charging fees it <br /> levied on its users — one for the connection and the other for the energy itself. It turned <br /> out that the resistance was a result of drivers' EV charging needs. <br /> https://www.publicpower.org/periodical/article/understanding-how-ev-drivers-make-decisi... 7/30/2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.