Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Johnson asked if the other lots that did not meet minimum depth were legal when they <br />were platted. Mr. Carlton stated he was not sure what the requirements were back then, but <br />they now are legal non-conforming lots. Chair Johnson asked if the lots were split, would <br />they be smaller than others in the neighborhood. Mr. Carlton stated they would be smaller <br />than most at .3 acres each, with the rest of the neighborhood at about .6 acres each. <br /> <br /> Chair Johnson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br /> Kendra Lindahl, 19358 Norfolk Avenue, neighbor to the adjacent subject property, stated <br />that the proposed lot split was not consistent with the neighborhood, since most of the lots <br />were 30,000 square feet. She stated that the city’s comprehensive plan states the intent is to <br />preserve the character of neighborhoods. Mrs. Lindahl stated that staff was using the <br />variance standards from one section of the city code and that she did not feel the request <br />met the standards listed in another part of the code. Mrs. Lindahl stated she did not believe <br />the request met the standards for granting a variance, noting the proposed lot would be too <br />small, would alter the neighborhood and would requiring destroying most of the trees. She <br />stated that she and her husband were opposed to the variance. <br /> <br /> Ryan Schneider, 12104 Highland Road, neighbor across the street from the subject property, <br />stated that he bought his home because of the large lots and mature trees and did not <br />support the variance. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Jeremy Johnson asked for clarification on the two sets of variance criteria <br />mentioned by Mrs. Lindahl. Mr. Carlton noted that the standards are found in both Sections <br />30-635 and 30-325. Staff feels that the request meets the 5 criteria. <br /> <br /> Chair Johnson stated that he had a problem with the request not meeting #4 and #5 of the <br />criteria. He stated that the lot was existing and nothing has changed. He felt that splitting <br />the lot was out of character for the neighborhood. Commissioner Jeremy Johnson agreed. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Konietzko asked what size the smallest lot in the neighborhood was. Mr. <br />Carlton stated that the smallest lot appears to be .6 acres. Commissioner Konietzko noted <br />that the smallest he found on Beacon was .57 acres. <br /> <br />Commissioner Keller stated that he agreed with Chair Johnson that splitting the lot and <br />building a smaller home would change the character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Petschl asked the Lindahls what was the footprint size of their home. Mr. <br />Lindahl stated that it was approximately 1,200 square feet, but it was a split level. Mrs. <br />Lindahl stated that most of the other homes in the neighborhood were similar in size and <br />style. Mr. Petschl stated that he felt the home proposed by Mr. Powell would fit in, since a <br />1,200 square foot footprint was not that large. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Jeremy Johnson stated that since there was not a specific need to split the lot <br />and that the city did not do anything to require a variance, he did not support the variance. <br /> <br /> There being no further public comment, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />