My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4 ERMUSR 12-13-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2005
>
12-13-2005
>
5.4 ERMUSR 12-13-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2022 10:39:31 AM
Creation date
8/6/2018 12:09:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
12/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River ---- <br /> Municipal Utilities <br /> 13069 Orono Parkway phone: 763.441.2020 <br /> Elk River,MN 55330 Fax.763 441.8099 <br /> October 4. 2005 <br /> ' To: Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> Jerry Takle <br /> John Dietz <br /> ' Jim Tralle <br /> From: Bryan Adams <br /> Subject: 4 ' Engine/Generator at Landfill <br /> ' As \on are aware. we are pursuing the installation ol'the 4° engine generator at the Elk <br /> River Landfill. The cost of this addition is estimated to be $650.000. <br /> 0 <br /> ,rhe air permit application has been submitted to the MPC A. Preliminary indications are <br /> the\ desire further study \\hich takes more time. Our consultants feel the outcome will <br /> not change and a permit will be issued. '[he Elk River Landfill is also applying for a <br /> ' landfill expansion permit, and the MPCA is apparently having difficulty keeping these <br /> two permit applications separate. <br /> ' In the process of negotiation with Waste Management, it is apparent they desire more <br /> payment for their gas to cover their increased cost. We subsequently ask Great River <br /> Energy if the wholesale purchase power price will increase for the 40 unit. .1'hey in <br /> ' response, increased the payment for the 4`h engine which increases the revenue by <br /> approximately $1.538,000 over the remaining 16 sears of the purchase power contract. <br /> The issue now at hand is how we distribute these extra funds back to the 3 parties of <br /> ' Waste Management. Elk River Municipal Utilities and Sherburne County in an equitable <br /> fashion. 'fhe attached financial pro-forms reflect projected revenue costs and <br /> distribution. Description of these pro-forms is as follo\\5. <br /> Line 12 IL<isting purchase price of energy <br /> Line 35 Proposed purchase price or energy <br /> ' Linc 37 Net difference in revenue to he distributed alter appropriate expenses <br /> have been increased clue to addition of 41h unit. <br /> line 41 Increase in revenue to Waste Management through <br /> higher gas price total increase $595,589 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.