My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. JFC SR 01-30-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Joint Finance Committee
>
Packets
>
2018
>
01-30-2018
>
4.1. JFC SR 01-30-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2018 8:17:23 AM
Creation date
7/30/2018 8:17:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
1/30/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Elk River, Minnesota <br /> Tax Increment Applications for Proposed Jackson Hill Residential Suites Housing Project and <br /> Elk River Lodge and Residential Suites, LLC <br /> January 25,2018 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Developer Pro forma But-For Analysis <br /> In approving a TIF district and project, the City must make several findings, including the "but for" test: that the <br /> proposed development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the <br /> reasonably foreseeable future. The developer has provided financial information showing that the operating cash <br /> flow requires financial assistance from the City to reduce the amount of debt and equity necessary to finance total <br /> project costs, as provided through the annual tax increment revenues from the projects, and provide a reasonable <br /> return on investment. The City also received letters from the anticipated financial lenders for both projects indicating <br /> that tax increment financing was necessary to obtain financing. The developer has stated the assistance is <br /> necessary due to the costs of developing the site as affordable housing and inability of the projects to support those <br /> costs upon completion. Based on the developer's stated position relative to the need for tax increment financing <br /> assistance, the City could make its"but for"finding and provide tax increment assistance. <br /> We recommend, however, that the City also consider an appropriate level and type of TIF assistance for the project <br /> based on the information submitted by the developer. The City's position relative to the use of tax increment will <br /> focus on financing of the extraordinary costs with a limited term of assistance. The level of assistance is in part <br /> dictated by the `extraordinary' costs of the project and inability of the project to support those costs. Initial <br /> discussions about the project indicate the assistance would be provided as reimbursement to assist the developer <br /> with the development of affordable housing in the community and a reduction in rental income resulting from the <br /> affordable housing units. <br /> Following thorough evaluation of the project as provided allows the City to be prepared to make an informed "but-for" <br /> decision based on the likelihood of the project needing assistance, as well as the appropriate level of assistance. <br /> The "but-for" test is used to determine whether a project is likely to proceed as proposed without the use of public <br /> dollars. Without the requested amount of tax increment assistance (15 years of TIF from the new project), the test is <br /> to determine if the proposed Jackson Hills site would be developed as an affordable housing project with at least <br /> 20% of the units occupied at 50% of the area median income. And alternatively, without assistance, review how the <br /> project would be constructed, if at all, and/or at non-income restricted levels or reduced amenities to lower project <br /> costs. The but-for test for the Elk River Lodge site is also to determine if the project as proposed would proceed but- <br /> for the City assistance. In the application for assistance, the developer has listed the planned improvements for the <br /> project site. It is our understanding that some of those improvements have commenced and are required by City <br /> code. The determination for the need for assistance (remaining 10 years of TIF from the Jackson Hills new project) <br /> is based on the likelihood of the project proceeding as proposed. This includes both the financing of the identified <br /> improvements, some of which may be required, as well as providing affordable housing units, as necessary to meet <br /> the definition of a housing project. <br /> We also reviewed varying documents including the developer's provided operating proforma and financial statements <br /> and also constructed similar ten-year project proformas, showing a result if the developer received assistance as <br /> pay-as-you-go(reimbursement for TIF eligible costs)and showing a result if the developer did not receive assistance. <br /> Our analysis of the proformas included a review of the development budget, projected operating revenues and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.