My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-1996 ERMU MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-08-1996 ERMU MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2018 3:33:35 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 3:33:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUMIN
date
10/8/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular meeting of the Elk River Utilities Commission <br /> October 8, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Mr. Zabee moved to accept the proposal by MSA for the <br /> Wellhead Protection Plan. Mr. Dietz seconded the motion. <br /> Motion carried 3-0 . <br /> The proposal for scope of services and budget for the <br /> trunk watermain on Highland Ave. necessary to connect the <br /> two high pressure water zones was reviewed. <br /> Mr. Dietz moved to accept the proposal by MSA for the scope <br /> of services and preliminary design for the trunk watermain. <br /> Mr. Zabee seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0 . <br /> 5 . 6 Update on FERC filing <br /> Mr. Adams advised the Commission that a Protest and Motion <br /> for Levy to Intervene out of Time was filed on 9-11-96, <br /> with respect to Anoka' s 7-12-96 filing. The Commission <br /> received the follow-up Protest Motion to Intervene and <br /> Request for Hearing on Behalf of Elk River Municipal <br /> Utilities . <br /> Further discussion ensued regarding the dilemma of our <br /> wholesale power rates. Economic development rates and <br /> load management were discussed. Mr. Adams reported on his <br /> meetings with UPA and AEC. <br /> It is the concensus of the Commission to keep our good <br /> relations with UPA, but to actively deal with the rate <br /> issues . Mr. Adams was directed to approach AEC with the <br /> needs that must be addressed, as well as the problem of <br /> supplier versus competitor. <br /> 6 . 1 URGE test and repair of #3 Diesel Unit <br /> Mr. Adams up-dated the Commission on the URGE (Uniform <br /> Rating of Generating Equipment) tests that were run on a 60 <br /> minute time this year, as opposed to 5 minutes in <br /> previous years . <br /> Mr. Adams discussed the possibility of UPA financially <br /> helping the Utilities repair the 300 KW #3 Diesel Unit . <br /> The pros and cons of the repairs were discussed, with <br /> considerations of pay-back times and possibilites of <br /> other ways to finance the repairs. <br /> Mr. Zabee moved to have the #3 Diesel Unit repaired in <br /> late 1997 . Mr. Dietz seconded the motion. Motion <br /> carried 3-0 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.