Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> December 12, 2000 <br /> Bryan Adams reiterated the opinion of the Utility Staff, that a satisfactory case has been presented <br /> regarding the Trott Brook Park site, or the Hillside Park Site. They are the best sites financially, and <br /> hydraulically. Further, it was noted that the Park and Recreation Commission originally had agreed on the Trott <br /> Brook Park site. <br /> John Dietz explained the City Council's consideration of D.R. Horton's position, noting that they did not feel <br /> they had been properly notified of the possibility of a water tower being built on that site. George Zabee does <br /> understand the concern by D.R. Horton,but does not understand their view regarding the value of the homes <br /> that will be built in that area versus existing less expensive homes. <br /> John Dietz stated that City Council approved the Trott Brook Park site, because they thought that D.R. Horton <br /> had been notified. Pat Klaers offered that D.R. Horton expected more formality in the information of the <br /> proposed tower site. Pat Klaers also responded that the Utilities has been offered the Deschenes property as a <br /> site, and that it is already owned by the City, and is not a park. Bryan responded to Pat Klaers inquiry about <br /> further clarification of the water pressure decrease at that site. John Dietz asks if the well could be put in <br /> Hillside Park, and the tower on the Deschenes property, citing Terry Mauer's calculations. Bryan noted that his <br /> calculations differ from those of the City Engineer, due to different design assumptions. Bryan Adams offered <br /> his opinion that quality services at reasonable prices, technically sound construction, and good risk management <br /> would be met at the Trott Brook Park site. <br /> James Tralle asked if D.R. Horton would object to Hillside, and if it was a reality that D.R. Horton would have <br /> to build less expensive homes because of the tower. Pat Klaers said the Deschenes property is politically the <br /> best site for a tower, even if it is not as good financially. James Tralle further questions the financial <br /> responsibility of a tower site,with specific regard to the Black Property. <br /> Dave Anderson, speaking for the Park and Recreation Commission stated that the Park and Recreation are not <br /> happy with the Trott Brook Park site, and feels the Hillside Park area would be better. He also states that they <br /> feel that a water tower on the Trott Brook Park site would be ludicrous, and aesthetically unappealing. Dave <br /> Anderson does not feel that there is any rush to build the tower at this time. He also feels that further searching <br /> for a site would be advisable. Dave added that he feels the approval of the Trott Brook Park site was a <br /> boondoggle deal. James Tralle asked Staff if the tower construction could be postponed, Pat Klaers asked <br /> Bryan Adams if an anticipated wet summer could delay the tower and well need. Bryan Adams responded that <br /> if a dry summer occurred, the water system could have difficulty meeting the demands. The possibility of <br /> stringently enforced sprinkling bans would have to be considered, as well as other measures to force <br /> conservation. <br /> John Dietz asked about the possibility of any alternatives offered by D.R.Horton. Dave Anderson said he is <br /> under the impression that the Black property could be dealt with immediately. Bryan Adams responded by <br /> saying that ultimately all liability falls to the Utility and the tower would be more expensive. George Zabee <br /> feels more attention needs to be paid to future probabilities of expansion. John Diez noted that the Deschenes <br /> property had not been presented to the City Council at the time of approval of the Trott Brook Park site. Bryan <br /> Adams again replied that the Utility is responsible for reliable and competent services to customers. <br />