Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> September 13, 2000 <br /> 5.1 Sherburne County Landfill Gas Presentation <br /> Bryan reviewed the draft proposal to expand the electric generation facility at the <br /> Elk River Landfill, along with the Draft Letter of Intent, and the Cash flow analysis. The <br /> participation between Sherburne County, Waste Management, and the Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities was further explained and discussed. Mr. Lucas addressed the <br /> environmental issues concerned, and stated that he expects the Sherburne County <br /> Commission to react favorably to the project. John Dietz asked about coordination of the <br /> commitment by all three parties involved. James Tralle responded in favor of the project. <br /> Bryan Adams noted that Great River Energy has recently advised that the Utilities will be <br /> charged for services for capacity displaced by this added generation. <br /> James Tralle moved to authorize completion of the Letter of Intent. George <br /> Zabee seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> 5.2 Update Electric Rate Study <br /> The initial report from R.W. Beck regarding the Elk River electric rates was <br /> presented and discussed, with forecasts and requirements to enable conclusions regarding <br /> revenue. No recommendations or rate design were included. Bryan Adams explained <br /> the cost of service/fixed cost approach. He also noted that it is anticipated that we <br /> relinquish block rates, the continuance of winter/summer rates to include demand <br /> customers, along with increasing customer fixed charges. James Tralle asked if a rate <br /> change would hurt the school customers. James Tralle asked for options to be included <br /> in the recommendations. George Zabee asked for Staff recommendations to be included <br /> in the options. <br /> 5.3 Review Proposed 2001 Capital Projects Budget <br /> The proposed 2001 Capital Budget with 10 year projections was presented and <br /> discussed. John Dietz noted that the years 2001 and 2002 appear to be heavily <br /> encumbered, and he would like to see a bigger spread between the years. John Dietz <br /> asked questions regarding territory acquisition. Discussion centered on future water <br /> towers, wells, treatment plants, and the future need for a new office building and <br /> warehouse at the plant. The possibility of raising water rates to cover the increase in <br /> maintenance expense was discussed. <br />