Laserfiche WebLink
• Mr. Harlicker <br /> August 13, 2003 <br /> Page Two <br /> is being redeveloped, it would be appropriate to ask, through the platting process, for an <br /> additional ten feel of right-of-way along the 171st Avenue frontage of the property. As you <br /> are aware, 171st Avenue is a signalized intersection with TH 10 and is the beginning of the <br /> Twin Lakes Road corridor through East Elk River. It is reasonable to expect that some <br /> time in the future, the intersection of 171st Avenue with TH 10 will be reconstructed to <br /> provide a protected left turn lane, through lane, and right turn lane. This additional ten feet <br /> on the south side of 171st Avenue combined with a future acquisition of additional right-of- <br /> way on the north side of 171St Avenue will allow this type of upgrade to take place in the <br /> future. <br /> 4. It is our understanding that as part of the redevelopment of this property that platting will be <br /> required. We would recommend that the final plat show access control along the TH 10 <br /> and 171st Avenue frontage, with the exception of the three driveway locations noted <br /> previously. <br /> 5. In the future when 171st Avenue is reconstructed, it is expected that the road grade will be <br /> raised slightly. The existing road grade was set relative to the existing business located on <br /> the north side of the road. When that site is redeveloped, we anticipate that the site will be <br /> raised in elevation, allowing 1715t Avenue to be raised slightly also. This will eliminate the <br /> relatively steep grade of 171St Avenue right at the intersection with TH 10. The layout of <br /> • the Elk River Auto Stop should anticipate the slight raising of 171St Avenue in the future. It <br /> appears from the grading plan that the reconstruction of 1715t Avenue will only adversely <br /> affect their driveways, causing them to be reconstructed at a flatter grade. The developer's <br /> engineer should revisit this issue relative to their grading plan. <br /> 6. We have discussed storm drainage for this site quite extensively with the developer's <br /> engineer. As you are aware, the City's policy is that sites must limit the runoff from their <br /> site to the pre-existing rate after development. The pre-existing condition of this site was <br /> as a gas and service location with no ponding. Therefore, we have told the developer's <br /> engineer that they should get a quality control pond in accordance with the City <br /> requirements on the site and any detention that can be provided by this water quality pond <br /> would be acceptable. The grading plan shows a pond in the southeast corner of the site <br /> prior to discharging to the existing wetland. The calculations relative to peak flow into and <br /> out of the pond are adequate. The one additional calculation we would request is a dead <br /> storage volume according to NURP standards for Best Management Practices for Urban <br /> Runoff. <br /> 7. Trunk sanitary sewer and watermain currently exist along the south property line of the <br /> site. Services for the new development are proposed to come off of these lines. At the <br /> staff review meeting, the Fire Department representative indicated that a hydrant on the <br /> project site may be required. We have not met to review the site plan as of yet. Currently, <br /> an additional hydrant is shown in the island area next to the trash receptacle at the <br /> southwest corner. We will review this with the Fire Chief and provide comment to the <br /> developer's engineer. <br /> • <br /> Ltr-081303 Harticker Howard R.Green Company <br />