My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3.1
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2003
>
07-22-2003
>
Item 3.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 12:45:17 PM
Creation date
7/23/2018 12:45:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 <br /> April 25, 1995 <br /> enough time for them to cross and they end up waiting in the median for the light <br /> to change. He felt that this is an unsafe situation, and that a similar situation will <br /> occur if another light is placed at 197th and Highway 169. He stated he does not <br /> feel Dennis Anderson's rights are being violated since he would be allowed to <br /> develop the property as residential. <br /> Kent Peabody, 11713 200th Avenue NW, stated that in contacting Mn/DOT, he <br /> was told there would not be any additional accesses on Highway 169 between <br /> School Street and County Road 33. He noted that there does not appear to be <br /> enough room to allow truck traffic on 197th. <br /> Paul Ostmoe, 19644 Irving Street, questioned whether there is a precedent in any <br /> metro area to develop a large commercial site in the middle of a residential <br /> area. <br /> Bob Sturgis, 11789 197th Avenue NW, expressed his concern that people have no <br /> way of knowing what intentions may be for a particular piece of property if it is <br /> not documented. He also expressed his concern that the property east of <br /> Highway 169 as well as Outlot A should remain residential. <br /> Perry Mason, 11847 196th Avenue NW, asked that the Planning Commission <br /> recommend that the City Council deny the request. <br /> Ted Travica, 19702 Irving Street NW, expressed his concern that people should not <br /> be threatened with the prospect of apartments if Mr. Anderson's request is <br /> denied, since high density residential would not be permitted within this zoning <br /> district. <br /> Robin Tuttle, 13390 Ranch Road, urged the Brentwood residents to follow this issue <br /> through to the end and also, to attend the Steering Committee meetings. <br /> There being no further comments from the public, Chair Kuester closed the public <br /> hearing. <br /> Staff and Commissioners gave the following responses to comments and <br /> questions that were raised by the public: <br /> -The apartment project behind the Central Lutheran Church was approved <br /> before the moratorium went into effect. <br /> -The precedent for commercial developments surrounded on three sides by <br /> existing residential in the metro area would have to be researched. <br /> -A complete berm along the Jackson Avenue side of Elk Park Center cannot be <br /> done and still save the trees. A combination of berming and trees will likely be <br /> done. <br /> -Outlot A is currently zoned single family residential; multi-family would not be <br /> allowed in its current zoning designation. Anything other than the uses allowed <br /> • under the R 1 c zoning would require a rezoning. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.