Laserfiche WebLink
• Mr. Rohif <br /> February 14, 2003 <br /> Page Two <br /> that if there is to be any gravel sales to others, that it is conditioned upon a MnDOT permit <br /> being granted for access to and from TH169, including any and all improvements to the <br /> highway that MnDOT requires. Finally, we would recommend that access for gravel <br /> mining sales be limited to the Elk River Bituminous access to TH169. The reason for this <br /> is that if MnDOT requires improvements to the highway, we feel they should be made at <br /> this location so that trucks hauling asphalt product from Elk River Bituminous can also <br /> utilize the improved access onto and off of TH169. <br /> 2. It should be noted that MnDOT has designated TH169 as an Interregional Corridor (IRC), <br /> where the primary function of the highway is to facilitate the traffic flow between regional <br /> trade centers with predictable travel speeds and a high emphasis on safety. The recently <br /> completed study of TH169 by MnDOT proposes long-term plans to convert TH169 to a <br /> freeway design standard. This, of course, would mean that there would be full access <br /> control and interchanges built at strategic locations along the route. Although these plans <br /> are likely sometime in the future before any implementation, we would recommend that a <br /> condition on the gravel mining CUP be that any access to and from TH169 be modified in <br /> the future to accommodate any IRC improvements either short term or long term. <br /> 3. The applicant submittal information contained only limited detail regarding drainage, <br /> erosion control, and sedimentation. In our discussion on February 13 with the applicant <br /> S and his consultant, it was agreed that the applicant would need an NPDES permit prior to <br /> any operation. This permit would require that a storm water pollution plan be prepared. In <br /> addition, we would propose a condition that no operation of the gravel mining take place <br /> until a drainage plan be submitted, reviewed and approved by City staff. We discussed <br /> with the applicant and his representatives that this drainage plan would include temporary <br /> sedimentation ponds for run-off prior to discharging to wetlands on the site or discharging <br /> off the site. <br /> 4. We agreed with the applicant that he will widen and bituminous surface the access road to <br /> his site that is shared with the two businesses and one homeowner near TH169. The <br /> agreement was that all sections of the roadway, which are shared traffic between the <br /> gravel mining operation and businesses or homes in the area, would be a minimum of 20 <br /> feet wide and be bituminous surfaced. The applicant needs to provide documentation that <br /> the easement over this area and/or permission from the other property owners provides <br /> him the right to make these improvements. <br /> 5. Other issues that we discussed at the meeting with the applicant and his representatives I <br /> assume will be covered in great detail in your memo; these would include the following: <br /> • Active mine face will need to be fenced. <br /> • A water truck for dust control needs to be present at the site. The source of water <br /> would be from the Elk River Bituminous site. <br /> • Oak wilt restrictions need to be met with no cutting of trees between July 15 and <br /> April 15 <br /> • <br /> Howard R. Green Company <br /> Ltr-021403-Rohif doc CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />