My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5.2
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2002
>
12-17-2002
>
Item 5.2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 10:13:07 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 7 <br /> November 19,2001 <br /> 41111 COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br /> CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 6.4. Request by the City of Elk River for a Land Use Plan Amendment to Include Certain <br /> Property in the Urban Service District <br /> Senior Planner Scott Harlicker indicated that the City is requesting to amend the <br /> Comprehensive Plan to include approximately 80 acres in the Urban Service District <br /> along the south side of 175th Avenue east of Twin Lakes Road. Scott stated that the <br /> Planning Commission recommended denial of the request and staff recommends <br /> approval of the request. <br /> Scott reviewed the staff report. He distributed and read into the record a letter from <br /> Geraldine Graham, 17451 Tyler Street that was addressed to the Council. Ms. Graham <br /> indicated that she was opposed to the request. <br /> Councilmember Dietz questioned whether the existing property owners would be <br /> assessed for trunk sewer and water. City Administrator Pat Klaers indicated that the <br /> Council typically does not assess existing homeowners for trunk utility extensions. He <br /> further indicated that the Council could put any type of time stipulation on the trunk <br /> assessment to the undeveloped areas, much like what was done for the area north of <br /> 175`h Avenue. <br /> • The Council discussed the request and stated it was not in favor of the request due to <br /> the following reasons: <br /> • Most of the residents are not in favor of the request. <br /> • Although the area will be included in the urban service district at some time, <br /> the Council wanted the request to come from the residents. <br /> • The Council is not interested in assessing residents for sewer and water if they <br /> don't request it. <br /> • The Council felt it was important to update the Comprehensive Plan prior to <br /> making these types of land use decisions. <br /> COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN MOVED TO DENY THE LAND USE PLAN <br /> AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE CERTAIN PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE <br /> OF 175' AVENUE IN THE URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT. <br /> COUNCILMEMBER KUESTER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br /> CARRIED 4-1. COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ OPPOSED. <br /> The Council requested that the Planning Commission discuss the need to revise the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. The Director of Planning indicated that she would discuss this at <br /> the December Planning Commission meeting. <br /> 7. Other Business <br /> • No other business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.