My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5.2
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2002
>
12-17-2002
>
Item 5.2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2018 10:13:07 AM
Creation date
7/23/2018 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br /> July 24,2001 <br /> Page 4 <br /> • that they have not spoken with the school district. He felt that it makes sense to service this <br /> area and that it will have a positive impact. <br /> There being no further public comment, Chair Pederson closed the public hearing. <br /> Commissioner Schuster asked Mr.Maurer his opinion on the issue. Mr.Maurer stated that <br /> he was in agreement that it would be more cost-effective to combine areas to be serviced, <br /> rather that to"piece-meal"services to only 11 lots. He stated that the system would have to <br /> be looped to service a small area. <br /> Chair Pederson,Commissioners Franz,Schuster and Baker expressed their concurrence that <br /> it makes more sense to consider this whole area. Commissioner Schuster stated that he <br /> would like to know how the other property owners feel about the issue. Mr.Maurer stated <br /> that approximately 200 acres of the area designated for services in 2007 has already been <br /> approved or approval is requested for services at this time. Mr.Harlicker stated that there is <br /> the same situation on 181st Avenue,where there are smaller parcels and services are being <br /> extended to larger parcels for development. <br /> Discussion followed regarding various options for acting on the request by the applicant. <br /> Mr.Harlicker stated that the Commission could either approve or deny the request,or table <br /> the request until such time as the area can be looked at as a whole. <br /> City Attorney Peter Beck stated that the Council would need to determine whether or not <br /> this property should have been included in the urban service district in the first place,and,if <br /> • the 2007 date should continue to be used as a guideline for development. He stated that it is <br /> the City Council's policy to request the developer/property owners bear the entire cost of <br /> extending utilities. He stated that the City Council has the discretion to deny a request for <br /> extension of utilities prior to 2007,if they choose. He felt that when the 2007 date was <br /> established,the issue was staging the city's ability to build the infrastructure and also to allow <br /> the property owners time to make decisions. <br /> City Attorney Peter Beck asked if the applicant was willing to waive the required 120 day time period <br /> for action on his application by the City Council. Mr.Brown,representing the applicant, <br /> stated that they would be willing to waive the t;,,,e limit and would provide a letter stating so <br /> to staff. <br /> COMMISSIONER BAKER MOVED TO TABLE INDEFINITELY THE <br /> REQUEST BY CASCADE LAND COMPANY, LLC FOR A LAND USE MAP <br /> AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE URBAN <br /> SERVICE DISTRICT. COMMISSIONER SCHUSTER SECONDED THE <br /> MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> CHAIR PEDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> CONSIDER THE ENTIRE 80 ACRE SITE FOR INCLUSION IN THE URBAN <br /> SERVICE AREA,AS OUTLINED BY STAFF. COMMISSIONER FRANZ <br /> SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> 5.3. Request by Dynamics Design and Land Company for Preliminary Plat Approval(Hilltop <br /> Woods Estates 2nd Addition), Public Hearing— Case No. P 01-11 <br /> • Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Dynamics Design and Land Co.requests g q s preliminary plat <br /> approval for a 20.16 acre clustered single family development. The applicant is allowed 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.