Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> November 13, 2001 <br /> 5.3 Review 10 Year Cash Reserve Projections <br /> Staff reviewed the Springsted Cash Reserve Projection Model for the Electric and Water departments. <br /> The Water cash reserve model has a slight recession built in. Variables, such as weather were discussed, along <br /> with future rate increases. These studies indicate both departments can accommodate the anticipated growth, <br /> and maintain close to the desired cash balances, although the Water department will be a little more <br /> challenging. <br /> 5.4 Consider Proposed 2002 Budget <br /> The budget was reviewed, with highlights, assumptions, and capital budget changes discussed. George <br /> Zabee noted that he would like to discuss the proposed Electric and Water Rates, before approval of the budget. <br /> 5.5 Consider Proposed 2002 Electric & Water Rates <br /> In order to support the assumptions for the proposed 2002 budget, both the electric and water rates must <br /> be revised. Electric and Water tariff sheets with the proposed changes, and rate comparisons with other utilities <br /> were reviewed. Staff recommends the increase. <br /> James Tralle moved to approve the rate increases for Electric of$0.0050/KWH, with the exception of <br /> the Energy Management rate, and of Water to a Winter rate of the existing $1.15/1000 gal., and a Summer rate <br /> of$1.20/1000 gal. John Dietz seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> John Dietz moved to approve the Electric and Water Budget for 2002, as presented. James Tralle <br /> seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> Further discussion included the Sub-station North included in the 2002 Electric Capital Budget. James <br /> Tralle feels that bonding at the present time would be advantageous, with the current low interest rates. Staff <br /> and Commission agreed. <br /> James Tralle moved to authorize bonding for Sub-station North. John Dietz seconded the motion. <br /> Motion carried 3-0. <br /> 6.1 Review and Consider Schedule and Proposal for Garage at Power Plant <br /> The garage addition at the power plant was reviewed, regarding design, bidding, construction, and <br /> preliminary work. George Zabee asked for further clarification of the site of the addition. John Dietz asked if <br /> all equipment and supplies would be located inside the new garage. Staff responded that wire and poles would <br /> still have to be stored outside. John Dietz urged Staff to use constraint in the planning and design of the new <br /> garage. <br /> John Dietz moved to proceed with the engineering phase of the new garage project. George Zabee <br /> seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br />