Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> January 15, 2002 <br /> James Tralle notes that the Utilities have been consistent with all other facilities, with special noting <br /> of the Elk River Public Schools. <br /> Pat Klaers said the metropolitan council is used as a guide, rather than a rule. <br /> John Dietz asked if schools and churches are charged differently for WAC and SAC charges; Bryan <br /> Adams replying no. <br /> James Tralle moved to deny the request from Christian Missionary Alliance for reduction of the <br /> WAC charges billed August 31, 2001. John Dietz seconded the motion. <br /> George Zabee asked for further discussion, and states that he wants to stay consistent, but if the City <br /> would change its mind on the refunding of SAC charges, the Utility would again look at the issue. <br /> Motion carried 3-0. <br /> 5.4 Review LFG Contracts <br /> Bryan Adams updated the Commission on the landfill gas to electric generation project. Ron Black <br /> appeared to review the following documents: <br /> a. Grant of Easement <br /> b. Gas Purchase Contract <br /> c. Service Agreement <br /> d. Security Agreement/Promissory Note <br /> James Tralle asked if there are red flags in the documents that should be discussed. Ron Black and <br /> Bryan Adams responded with possible scenarios that could occur, and the question of the quality of gas at a <br /> future time. George Zabee asked about an oversight committee. James Tralle noted that he feels the LFG <br /> project is an excellent conservation tool. By consensus, the Commission desires to continue with the project. <br /> 5.3 Review & Consider CIP Spending Options <br /> In review, the Minnesota Energy Security& Reliability Act enacted in 2001 requires municipal <br /> utilities to spend 1.5% of gross electric revenues on Conservation Improvement Programs (CIP). <br /> Compliance is required by June, 2003. <br /> Vance Zehringer presented a list of possible programs. Vance Zehringer, and Bryan Adams ranked <br /> the desirability of the proposed programs, and explained the list to the Commission. <br /> Maximizing benefit to customers, while minimizing staff time is important, stressing the need to <br /> focus on a few of the programs, rather than the entire list. Staff was directed to return with fewer choices for <br /> spending the needed amount of money. <br /> 5.1 Update Substation North <br /> Bryan Adams reviewed and updated the proposal phase for Substation North. He further proposed <br /> that ERMU will be the general contractor for the project. The Commission concurred. <br />