Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br /> October 15, 2003 <br /> 5.2 Review Street Light Maintenance Survey <br /> At the request of the Commission, Bryan Adams compiled a survey of other communities regarding <br /> street light maintenance. There does not appear to be a norm for the maintenance. Discussion followed on <br /> the various ways that street light issues are handled. Further discussion of this topic will continue at a future <br /> meeting. Staff, and Commission will continue to seek more information, and agreements that may be on <br /> file. No action necessary. <br /> 5.3 Review Bulk Water Rate Survey <br /> Bryan Adams reported on the survey conducted concerning the rates for bulk water sales. It appears that <br /> most communities conduct business as the ERMU has been doing. Normal water rates are in the $1.00 to <br /> $2.00 per 1000 gallon range. ERMU charges a flat $10.00 per load. Communities utilizing automatic fill <br /> stations charge approximately .25 per 100 gallons, and that appears to be the cost ERMU will use. John <br /> Dietz asked for clarification of the procedures, and discussion continued regarding back flow prevention, and <br /> illegal use of hydrants. John Dietz further questions whether or not the Utility will be able to realize any pay <br /> back for the cost of the installation of the bulk station, and notes that he believes some administrative <br /> charges should be put into place. Discussion will continue at a future meeting. <br /> 5.4 Update Great River Energy Wholesale Electric Rate <br /> Bryan Adams updated the Commission on the first cut at the revised two tier rates being proposed by <br /> Great River Energy,resulting in a 7.3% increase to ERMU. The exact rate structure is still undetermined. <br /> This item, with associated spread sheet, is for discussion only. James Tralle asked what the driver for the <br /> increase in natural gas prices. Staff responded that de-regulation and high demand are the main reasons. No <br /> action necessary. <br /> 5.5 Review Revised Electric Capital Budget <br /> The electric capital budget for 2004 was presented at the September 9, 2003. Since that time, Staff has <br /> analyzed the need for additional capacity to support further growth. The revised distribution projects,the <br /> time schedule for future projects, and the revised 10 year capital project projections were presented, and <br /> discussed. Causes for expansion were further reviewed. The load growth is driving the necessary revisions, <br /> as well as continued territory acquisition. The probable need for bonding in 2004, for projects was <br /> discussed. No action necessary. <br /> 6.1 Review& Consider Proposed Expense Budget <br /> Staff presented the detailed revenue, and expense budget, with overviews, comparisons, and <br /> summaries. Revenue, and expense increases on a percentage basis were reviewed. A general discussion <br /> between Staff, and Commission continued. No action necessary. Final budget will be presented at the <br /> November 2004 meeting. <br />