Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission/CU 02-24 <br /> June 25,2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • <br /> Building setbacks are not defined in the Elk River Crossing PUD but the building does meet <br /> the C3 zoning setbacks. <br /> Design Standards <br /> The bottom three-quarters of the facades will consist of a brick veneer with the upper one- <br /> fourth treated with precast and EIFS. The entrances are clearly defined with metal canopies <br /> and the there will be EIFS work at the cornice line. The proposed design meets the design <br /> standards for Elk River Crossing. The allowable signage, as defined by the Elk River <br /> Crossing PUD,is two wall signs per principle building. There are 4 signs indicated,which <br /> exceeds the maximum allowed. <br /> Landscaping <br /> There was no landscape plan submitted and the applicant will need to provide a plan that <br /> meets the City's minimum standards. <br /> Although there was a trash enclosure indicated on the site plan,there were no elevations <br /> provided showing materials and dimensions. The Elk River Crossing PUD states <br /> "dumpsters should be within an enclosure constructed of the same materials and colors as <br /> those used in the building." <br /> IIIThere was no monument sign indicated and if one is desired, it shall be located at least 10 <br /> feet from all property lines. <br /> Parking and Circulation <br /> Based on the square footage of the building and the City's requirement of one parking stall <br /> for every 40 sq.ft. of customer floor area,which is approximately 1,000 square feet,a total <br /> of 25 parking stalls would be required. The proposed layout exceeds this requirement with a <br /> total of 38 total stalls. The minimum 10'setback from the property line is also maintained. <br /> For parking lots with 26-50 stalls,there is a minimum requirement of two accessible stalls. <br /> The submitted site plan indicates two handicap-parking stalls. <br /> The proposed layout provides a shared access to the site off of Zane Street at the north <br /> property line as well as a second access off of Zane Street on the south property line,which <br /> is not a shared access. The applicant's desire for the two access points is to provide a drive- <br /> thru window and a convenient drive pattern for truck deliveries. Having two accesses to one <br /> property from Zane Street has been undesired with past requests. Staff feels that it would be <br /> more appropriate to have only one shared access at the north property line with internal <br /> connections to the property to the south. <br /> Staff has provided two alternate designs that address both Zane Street access as well as the <br /> • applicant's desires to have a drive-thru window and convenient truck deliveries. Staff <br /> S:\PLANNING\Case Files\CU 02-24 Subway\CU02-24_PC.DOC <br />