My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6.3
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2002
>
03-26-2002
>
Item 6.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2018 2:26:30 PM
Creation date
7/16/2018 2:26:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Planning Commission/CU 01-10 <br /> March 26,2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • is an existing wall sign on the front of the building. On January 24,2000 the applicant was <br /> issued a sign permit for a 75 square foot sign for the front of the building and a permit to <br /> install a new face on the 64 square foot freestanding sign. <br /> On June 20, 1988 the City Council approved a sign package for this building that included <br /> the existing freestanding sign and 128 square feet of wall signage for each occupant on any <br /> side of the building. The applicant is seeking to amend this package to allow 195 square feet <br /> of signage and to put signs on 2 sides of the building. For comparison, the wall sign <br /> requirement for the C3 (Highway Commercial District)is up to 3 signs totaling 2 square feet <br /> of wall signage for every foot of linear building frontage.This occupant has 65 linear feet of <br /> building frontage,which would permit 130 square feet of signage if the property were zoned <br /> C3. <br /> Analysis <br /> Staff agrees with the applicant that a sign on the rear of the building is needed to identify the <br /> business from Highway 169. The following other businesses in the center have made the <br /> same argument and were allowed signs that faced the highway : <br /> • Buffalo Wild Wings ... ... ... 72 sf. <br /> • Northstar Access ... ... ... ... 40 sf. <br /> • 1St Barber ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 35 sf. <br /> III <br /> • Mann Theaters <br /> • The Gym ... ... ... .... ... ... .. 42 sf. <br /> However, staff does have a concern with the size of the sign. <br /> The existing wall sign on the front of the building is 3 feet tall by 25 feet long.If the square <br /> footage of the existing sign(75 sf.)were subtracted from the maximum allowed(128 sf.),the <br /> applicant would be allowed an additional 53 square feet of signage. The applicant is <br /> proposing an additional 120 square feet of signage. <br /> The total square footage for both signs would be 195 square feet which exceeds the <br /> maximum allowed by 67 square feet or about 50%.A second wall sign slightly shorter than <br /> the existing sign would be a more reasonable alternative.A sign 3 feet tall and 20 feet long <br /> would be 60 square feet. This could be accomplished by reducing the size of the sign box; <br /> the actual message of the sign and size of the letters and logo would be the same as the <br /> existing sign. The total sign area for these two signs would be 135 square feet,exceeding the <br /> maximum allowed by only 7 square feet. <br /> A second alternative, and equally acceptable, would be to use individual letters. When <br /> individual letters are used,the area is measured by drawing a square around the letters and <br /> logo. The area of that square is then the square footage of the sign. <br /> III <br /> S:\PLANNING\Case Files\CU 02-10 Checker\Cu02-10Mar26pc.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.