Laserfiche WebLink
• TEN COMMON MISTAKES IN LAND USE ORDINANCES <br /> A Presentation to the 2002 Minnesota Association of City Attorneys <br /> Educational Conference and Annual Meeting <br /> February 8-9,2002 <br /> Duke Addicks, Special Counsel, League of Minnesota Cities <br /> (651)281-1221. addicks@lmnc.org <br /> In reviewing over 60 sets of land use ordinances over the past three years, I have <br /> discovered that there are many common mistakes made by those who drafted them. <br /> Also, there have been several changes in the Municipal Planning Act(M. S. §§ <br /> 462.351 to 462.365) which conflict with and override provisions in existing land use <br /> ordinances. <br /> City attorneys should encourage every planning commission and zoning <br /> administrator to review their existing ordinances to determine if they are consistent <br /> with the following suggestions. <br /> 1. 60 Day Rule.Most city zoning ordinances have built in time limits which, if <br /> followed,would result in a timeline which exceeds that permitted by law. <br /> Timelines should either not be included in land use ordinances or changed to <br /> conform to the 60 day rule. Also,the 60 day rule requires that the <br /> • approval/disapproval process operate in a certain way. <br /> • M. S. § 15.99 requires cities to issue or deny zoning permits, rezoning <br /> petitions, and to approve or deny other land use related applications, <br /> including applications for variances and conditional use permits,within 60 <br /> days after a complete application is received or the application will be <br /> deemed approved. An application is deemed completed unless within ten <br /> days after the application is received written notice is given the applicant of <br /> what information is missing in order for the application to be complete. <br /> • A city council must either approve or deny an application within 60 days <br /> after the completed application is filed,unless the Council determines within <br /> that 60 day period that an additional 60 days is necessary and informs the <br /> applicant in'writing of its decision to and the reasons for extending the first <br /> 60 day period by an additional 60 days. <br /> • If a city denies the application it must state in writing at the time of the <br /> denial the reasons for the denial.Written notice of the approval or denial <br /> must be sent to the applicant within the 60 day period. <br /> • The failure of a vote to approve an application is not deemed to be a denial of <br /> the application. A motion to deny the application must be adopted.See <br /> Manco of Fairmont v. Town Board of Rock Dell Township, 583 N.W. 2d 293 <br /> (Minn.App. 1998). <br /> 2. Time Frame for Plat Approval. Likewise many land use ordinances have • <br /> • timelines inconsistent with the law concerning plat approval. <br /> 1 <br />