My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2002
>
02-04-2002
>
Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2018 1:53:40 PM
Creation date
7/16/2018 1:53:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City Council&Planning Commission <br /> February 4,2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • Specific concerns that can be expressed by the two groups will also be helpful for the <br /> facilitator as he leads the committee through the review of the plan. <br /> Composition of the Committee <br /> In 1995 a steering committee was established to review the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Sixteen members of the community served on the steering committee. The Planning <br /> Commission has suggested that a similar process be used for this review of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. In addition to members of the general public, the Commission <br /> suggested two members from each of the following commissions: <br /> City Council, <br /> Planning Commission, <br /> Economic Development Authority, <br /> Housing and Redevelopment Authority, <br /> Heritage Preservation Commission, and the <br /> Park and Recreation Commission. <br /> Staff would suggest that in order to keep the size of the committee at a manageable level, <br /> that one member of each commission with alternates be identified and included on the <br /> committee. This would provide six members from the established commissions. Staff <br /> would also suggest members representing the Chamber of Commerce and the River's Edge <br /> Downtown Business Association is included. We would further suggest that two to four <br /> • <br /> members of the general public,one representing the development community,be included. <br /> This would provide for a committee of 10 to 12 with no one group within the community <br /> overly represented. <br /> Staff that would support the committee and the work of the facilitator would include the <br /> City Administrator,the City Engineer,the Utilities Manager,the Director of Economic <br /> Development,the Planning Director,the Senior Planner,the Park Planner,and the Building <br /> and Zoning Administrator. <br /> Staff looks forward to the joint meeting discussion and receiving clear direction regarding <br /> the issues to be reviewed. <br /> • <br /> S:\PLANNING\COMPPLAN\2-4memoJointMtg.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.