Laserfiche WebLink
I Commentary: Comprehensive planning process suffered from structural flaws <br /> • In response to many requests for corn- facilitate all of these meetings <br /> 1 ments from members of the commune- Commentary ran December 2, 2001 in the <br /> There should have been fewer, but <br /> Duluth News Tribune. Reprinted here with <br /> ty and media, we are submitting this more focused, planning district <br /> point of view column on SmithGroup permission of the paper. workshops. <br /> JJR's perspective on the Duluth Com-prehensive Plan and our firm's termi- should have been more directly ■ We should have undertaken a <br /> nation as the lead consultant for the involved in the planning process mailed opinion survey of all <br /> project. and the public meetings. households in the city, in lieu of <br /> ■ The concept of having two leader the excessive number of planning <br /> We offer these comments in the spirit district meetings. SmithGroup JJR <br /> of sharing some constructive insights ship committees —the Steering proposed a survey, but it was elim- <br /> into the planning process. We share Committee and the "watch dog" Mated by city staff for budgetary <br /> ` Citizen's Advisory Committee <br /> I the recognition by many community reasons. <br /> members that Duluth needs an updat- was counter-productive The two <br /> ed comprehensive plan that reflects a committees should have been On a technical basis, we feel that the <br /> broadly-shared vision for the future merged early in the process. It SmithGroup JJR team, including our <br /> would have been much more con- subconsultants, Arrowhead Regional <br /> Regarding the reasons for Smith- structive to have key members of Development Commission and Jane <br /> Group JJR's termination from this the CAC in the tent helping the Silberstein, performed well We have <br /> project, we believe they are primarily process —rather than outside crit- complied with the terms of our agree- <br /> political in nature. We believe the iciznng the process. ment with the city We have attended <br /> planning process has had some serious numerous additional meetings and <br /> structural and procedural problems ■ While we had a good Steering have undertaken extra work tasks, at <br /> 1 that have impacted the outcome. We Committee, we lacked representa- the request of city staff, which were <br /> believe the primary reasons for the tion from many important ele- beyond our contracted scope of ser- <br /> termination of our contract reside in ments in the community, such as vices. • <br /> • these structural "flaws" in the plan- the school district, University of <br /> fling process and not with perfor- Minnesota Duluth, the hospitals While there have been some schedul- <br /> mance issues. and organized labor. These key ing glitches, there were clear reasons <br /> institutions should have been rep- <br /> 1for these delays, and city staff has <br /> The following points summarize some resented on the Steering Commit- been kept fully apprised of the sched- <br /> of our key areas of concern about the uling situation. As for the next steps, <br /> tee. <br /> process: we hope that we can successfully <br /> 1 ■ The initial rounds of the planning bring SmithGroup JJR's role in the <br /> • The City Council and Planning <br /> Commission should have been at district meetings were primarily project to a reasonable and logical <br /> focused on organizational issues. point of closure With some careful <br /> the table from the beginning of the rather than on substantive plan- coordination between our firm and <br /> project. The notion of an adminis- ning issues. The decision to reor- city staff, we believe the maps and <br /> tration-led plan versus a council- <br /> ganize the city into the 10 plan- data we have assembled and our work <br /> led plan has been an ongoing issue ning districts, which was made with the planning districts can be <br /> of concern. before we were hired, was con- wrapped up in a manner that allows <br /> • The recent opinion by the city at- fused with the comprehensive plan the plan to be put aside and picked up <br /> torney that implementation of the process. The organizational as- at a future date when the entire pro- <br /> comprehensive plan requires City pects of establishing the planning cess can be completed. During the re- <br /> Council approval changed the districts should have been separat- mauling weeks of our involvement <br /> complexion of the process We ed from the comprehensive plan with the project, we will remain com- <br /> support the city attorney's opin- process. mined to helping the city move for- <br /> ion. This opinion should have ward with the comprehensive plan <br /> ■ The number of planning district <br /> been rendered in the early part of meetings, which were publicly process <br /> the process, rather than toward the announced by the city admimstra- John Stockham,a principal with <br /> end. tion to be over 240 meetings, was SmithGroup JJR,was hired to lead the <br /> ■ The director of planning and de- excessive There is not enough comprehensive planning process for <br /> • velopment and other senior staff trained and qualified city staff to Duluth. <br /> December 2001 <br /> :.. ___ _ � planer . - <br />