06-04-2018 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes Page 10 June 4, 2018 Councilmember Olsen stated they should figure out the total number and then prioritize the project. Councilmember Westgaard felt that there wasn't really any new information from the listening sessions and that the right target audience was not reached. It seemed that people were in support of a LOST but with the caveat that it must encompass a broader scope than just an ice arena. Whether the project is one large facility project or multiple smaller projects, he outlined the combined costs of all of the proposed projects would probably be close to $30 million. He asked if a half cent sales tax would support a $33 million project. Mr. Pormer stated it would. Councilmember Westgaard would like to address the three facilities and then get top priorities from the Park and Recreation Commission. The Council can then decide how much more they want to add. There are projects such as dredging Lake Orono and YAC initiatives that maybe should be included. Councilmember Olsen agreed that they needed a priority list. Councilmember Oval] felt what we are looking at today is different than what was discussed in 2016. Residents are more in favor of a LOST than property tax increase. The Council has one shot to get it right and need to examine our goal and vision and engage community stake holders. Selecting the right project for community value is being financially prudent. Mayor Dietz said, currently, people seem in favor of two of the plans but there is not time to develop an entirely new plan before the election. He felt a $30 million cost seemed too high. Councilmember Wagner asked what the goal of the Council was. Is it three facilities and that's it, or three facilities plus additional projects? Elk River is at a pivotal point looking at the broader vision. If LOST is desired, then the Council should look at future needs and have a broader vision. Mayor Dietz felt the top priorities are the Elk River Ice Arena and the Activity Center. He isn't sure how else the city would pay for these projects besides a LOST. If additional projects are included, they need to appeal to more people. Currently, the number seems too big no matter what it is for. How much of the total cost should be spent on the recreational facility improvements? He requested staff provide costs to the City Council. Mr. Portner offered to provide sample referendum language from other cities. Mayor Dietz doesn't know if the Council can get everything on the ballot. He suggested limiting the options to 1 or 2 for the recreational facilities improvements and create a list of priority projects to also include. FOtIRII Ir NATURE