Laserfiche WebLink
<br />16. Repair of City Hall Roof <br /> <br />The City Administrator reviewed the various bids received for repair to the <br />City Hall roof. Bids ranged from a low of $2,200 to as high as $8,500 for repai..' .. <br />"Jork to the City Hall. The Administrator explained that the vast difference .' <br />in prices resulted from different materials and, in some cases, .a different <br />type of roof system. The Administrator explained that the I0'oJ bid of $2,200 <br />from F. A. Tenny Company in Buffalo, should provide the City with an adequate <br />~oof for the dollars expended. COUNCILMAN ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPROVE THE BID <br />FROM F. A. TENNY COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,200 FOR REPAIR TO THE CITY HALt <br />ROOF. COUNCILMAN OTTO SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />17. Check Register <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN DUITSMAN MOVED APPROVAL OF THE CHECK REGISTER. COUNCILMAN ENGSTROM <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />18. TentativeAgenda for January 22, 1979 <br />Items to be considered at the January 22, 1979 meeting included: <br /> <br />1. Murco Builders Variance Request <br />2. Greenhead Acres 2nd Addition Final Plat <br />3. Report from Blaine Hid~vay All Pets on work accomplished to date. <br /> <br />19. Former Liquor Store !-1anager <br /> <br />Councilman otto indicated to the City Council that the former liquor store <br />manager had contacted him regarding several problems which the former liquor <br />store manager felt were not being addressed by the City Council and the ~ <br />City Administrator. Coun<itilman Otto mentioned that the former manager <br />claimed there was a discrfPancy in the amount of wages paid him, that his <br />vacation had not been paid to him, that an inventory expense he incurred <br />had also not been paid to him and the former manager also questioned the City's <br />appeal on his unemployment benefits. The City Administrator explained to the <br />Council that the former manager's wages were correct, as stated, and that no <br />discrepancy had taken place and that the former manager's vacation time would <br />be paid to him when the question of his Veterans hearing had been resolved. <br />The City Administrator also explained that the inventory expense the manager <br />claimed was due to him, was incurred without the approval of the Administrator <br />or the City Council and resulted in the former manager contracting with a person <br />not in the City's employment. As such, it was the Administrators opinion that this <br />expense should be borne by the former liquor store manager. The Administrator <br />indicated further that the appeal by the City for the former manager's unemployment <br />benefits claim was made because, in the opinion of the Administrator. the facts <br />presented to the State, in this matter, ~vere not correct and the City should not be <br />liable for the unemployment e?Cpense. <br /> <br />- <br />COUNCILMAN ENGSTROM MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. COUNCILMAN OTTO SECONDED. THE <br />MOTION. MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br />~L <br /> <br />Robert C. Middaugh <br />City Administrator <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RCM: sem <br />