My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 06-04-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2018
>
06-04-2018
>
10.2. SR 06-04-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2018 8:22:20 AM
Creation date
6/1/2018 9:56:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
6/4/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Process <br />A postcard mailing was sent to each mailing address within the local zip code. Ads and information articles were <br />placed in the Elk River Star News weekly newspaper. Information was shared on social media and the city <br />website. Invitations were sent via email blast to recipients on city information lists and contacts from local youth <br />athletic associations were notified of the scheduled meetings. The Elk River Area Chamber of Commerce was <br />also engaged to solicit participation from the local business community. <br /> <br />Citing concerns from social media posts regarding the recreation facility discussions and the lack of a true <br />community conversation, the City Council indicated it was imperative that every member of the community <br />have the opportunity to contribute to the conversation and it was implied that voices that did not participate <br />were in agreement with the Council’s direction on the final project. <br /> <br />In an effort to ensure all residents were aware of the listening sessions, information was disseminated by every <br />communication means available. <br /> <br />Participants <br />Between 17 and 50 participants attended each of the meetings, excluding city staff and elected officials. A small <br />handful of individuals attended two or more sessions. <br /> <br />Session Elements <br />Each session opened with an overview of the purpose for the listening session and included visual displays of <br />the three proposals discussed since 2016, a timeline of recreation facility acquisition, expansion, and <br />improvements, and a facility plan option comparison. <br /> <br />Four of the five meetings were facilitated by retired ISD #728 Community Engagement Director Charlie <br />Blesener and the other meeting facilitated by City Administrator Cal Portner. Each session utilized a <br />Community Café format with questions answered by participants and shared on a poster board. <br /> <br />Following the Community Café input, participants spent the remainder of the time in a Question and Answer <br />format. <br /> <br />The final two sessions included a straw poll regarding the implementation of a Local Option Sales Tax as a <br />funding mechanism and a poll to determine the most desired project of the three options recently considered. <br /> <br />Summary of Feedback <br />Responses to the three Community Café questions were shared on the city website. <br /> <br />Straw polls identified an overwhelming support for a Local Option Sales Tax and a desire for the Multi-purpose <br />Recreational Facility. <br /> <br />Next Steps <br />The City Council will have a number of conversations throughout the month of June with careful consideration <br />from the feedback they received. They intend to have a final decision by July 1, 2018, to ensure the community <br />is fully educated on their proposal should it be left for another voter referendum. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.