4.5. SR 06-04-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Exhibit 1 to Taxable TIF Note RISK FACTORS Risk factors on the amount of Tax Increments that may actually be received by the City include but are not limited to the following: 1. Value of Proiect. If the contemplated Project (as defined in the Development Agreement) constructed in the tax increment financing district is completed at a lesser level of value than originally contemplated, they will generate fewer taxes and fewer tax increments than originally contemplated. 2. Damage or Destruction. If the Project is damaged or destroyed after completion, their value will be reduced, and taxes and tax increments will be reduced. Repair, restoration or replacement of the Project may not occur, may occur after only a substantial time delay, or may involve property with a lower value than the Project, all of which would reduce taxes and tax increments. 3. Change in Use to Tax -Exempt. The Project could be acquired by a party that devotes them to a use which causes the property to be exempt from real property taxation. Taxes and tax increments would then cease. 4. Depreciation. The Project could decline in value due to changes in the market for such property or due to the decline in the physical condition of the property. Lower market valuation will lead to lower taxes and lower tax increments. 5. Non-payment of Taxes. If the property owner does not pay property taxes, either in whole or in part, the lack of taxes received will cause a lack of tax increments. The Minnesota system of collecting delinquent property taxes is a lengthy one that could result in substantial delays in the receipt of taxes and tax increments, and there is no assurance that the full amount of delinquent taxes would be collected. Amounts distributed to taxing jurisdictions upon a sale following a tax forfeiture of the property are not tax increments. 6. Reductions in Taxes Levied. If property taxes are reduced due to decreased municipal levies, taxes and tax increments will be reduced. Reasons for such reduction could include lower local expenditures or changes in state aids to municipalities. For instance, in 2001 the Minnesota Legislature enacted an education funding reform that involved the state increasing school aid in lieu of the local general education levy (a component of school district tax levies). 7. Reductions in Tax Capacity Rates. The taxable value of real property is determined by multiplying the market value of the property by a tax capacity rate. Tax capacity rates vary by certain categories of property; for example, the tax capacity rates for residential homesteads are currently less than the tax capacity rates for commercial and industrial property. In 2001 the Minnesota Legislature enacted property tax reform that lowered various tax capacity D-6 519394v8 JSB ELI 85A9