My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (3 sets) 06-04-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
06-04-2018
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (3 sets) 06-04-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2018 9:49:02 AM
Creation date
6/1/2018 8:35:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
6/4/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Minutes Page 3 <br /> May 7,2018 <br /> ----------------------------- <br /> Ms. Othoudt stated she went door to door to talk to the business owner and property <br /> owners along Jackson. She stated she's also communicated to the Downtown Elk River <br /> association of this project. <br /> Chair Toth asked if there were any audience members that would like to address the HRA. <br /> Tom Kolar, 708 Main St. NW—asked for clarification questions regarding the proposed <br /> district. He stated it was a very ambitious project. <br /> Debbie Rydberg, Executive Director of the Elk River Chamber of Commerce,asked if <br /> some of the buildings inspected don't meet the subpar standard,would they also be able to <br /> benefit from the TIF district and financing to make other improvements that are maybe not <br /> needed for your subpar standard. <br /> , <br /> Ms. Othoudt replied that typically the increment is used for very specific reasons and in this <br /> case, to make improvements on the building based upon the findings of the substandard <br /> report. <br /> Steve Johnson,309 Jackson St.,has owned the building since 1965. He stated the <br /> communication from the city to gain permission from him to inspect the building came up <br /> rather quickly but he did appreciate Ms. Othoudt explaining the potential redevelopment <br /> proposal to him. He stated he would like to work with the EDA to discuss the perspective <br /> of preserving the downtown and what makes sense for everybody involved. <br /> Ms. Othoudt explained the request before them was to approve by motion the proposal by <br /> LHB, Inc. She indicated staff will formalize the authorization to inspect properties from the <br /> Jackson site with written permission. <br /> Commissioner Ovall aske d"i' `t e HRA was o pproving this sunk cost,noting it's not in the <br /> budget. He indicated they're still exploring the feasibility of this redevelopment plan and <br /> doesn't feel they've received enough community feedback to proceed with incurring this <br /> expense. He wondered if they should be doing more communication with the businesses in <br /> the downtown area before proceeding with this step. <br /> Chair Toth stated he agreed with Commissioner Ovall's thoughts but felt without approving <br /> this proposal,it wouldn't provide them with the information the HRA needed to provide to <br /> potential developers. <br /> Commissioner Chuba disagreed with Commissioner Ovall and although he agreed it was an <br /> unbudgeted expense,the information obtained from the analysis would be critical in how the <br /> HRA proceeds, especially with the condition of the school district building. He noted time <br /> was of the essence. <br /> Commissioner Ovall stated he did see both sides of the issue but doesn't want it to become a <br /> preordained destiny. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.