My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-1982 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
08-23-1982 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:49 AM
Creation date
4/19/2005 2:34:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
8/23/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />August 23, 1982 <br />Page Four <br /> <br />Electrolux sales office from her home. Mayor Hinkle further indicated that the <br />Planning Commission unanimously approved the conditional use permit for a period <br />of six months, inasmuch as Ms. Swanson requested the permit for a six month period, <br />to see if the business would be successful. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Rick Breezee,Building.andZoning Administrator, indicated that he had received <br />a letter from Ms. Patti Swanson's neighbor indicating that they were in favor of <br />the approval of the conditional use request. <br /> <br />General discussion was carried on regarding the number of nonresident employees that <br />would be involved in the home occupation. Mr. Swanson indicated that there was a <br />possibility of a maximum of ten people that might be attending a training session <br />held on an average of once a week. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN DUITSMAN MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MS. PATTI SWANSON <br />AT 12651 HIGHWAY #10 FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN ELECTROLUX SALES OFFICE OPERATION FOR <br />A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. COUNCILMAN ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED <br />4-0. <br /> <br />7. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Section 900.18 of City Code Dealing with Accessory <br />Building Setbacks <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that when the City Code was recently adopted, <br />language was included in the Code which dealt with accessory use setbacks, and <br />further indicated that the intent of the language included in the Code was to have <br />a larger than normal setback for agricultural uses and metal buildings in re- <br />lation to residential areas. The City Administrator indicated that in reviewing <br />the adopted language in the City Code, it was found that the intended affect <br />was not what the language said in the Code. The City Administrator indicated that <br />to correct the problem, an Ordinance amendment was prepared and submitted to the <br />Planning Commission for their review, and further indicated that the Planning Com- <br />mission at their August 2, 1982 meeting, unanimously approved the language changes. <br />The City Administrator indicated that the City staff has discovered that there is <br />an additional problem with the accessory use setback language which affects at least <br />one platted area, specifically, Greenhead Acres 3rd Addition, and more than likely <br />will affect several other additional areas. The City Administrator, indicated that <br />the revised accessory use setback language makes it virtually impossible for agri~ <br />cultural accessory structures to be constructed within any platted area of the <br />City. The City Administrator indicated that in an attempt to deal with the treat- <br />ment of platted areas in the agricultural and residential zones, the staff devel,... <br />oped a second version of the amendment to the accessory use setback language which <br />now makes a provision for the issuance of a conditional use permit in the platted <br />areas of the agricultural and residential aones which will superced'e the 600 foot <br />minimum distance for agricultural accessory use and metal exterior buildings in <br />those particular zones. The City Administrator further indicated that under Ord- <br />inance 82-7, the Planning Commission and City Council would review on a case by <br />case basis, each request for the construction of accessory use structures for <br />agr~cultural purposes within a platted area, and that in their review it would be <br />necessary to determine an appropriate setback that fits the specific situation pre- <br />sented. The City Administrator further indicated that the second step in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.