08-09-1982 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r REGULAR SEMI-MONTHLY MEETING QFTHE ELK RIVER CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE ELK RIVER PUBLIC LIBRARY AUGUST 9, 1982 Members Present: Mayor Hinkle, Councilmembers Schuldt and Toth Members Absent: Councilmembers Duitsman and Engstrom 1. The meeting was called to order at 7: 30 p.m. by Mayor Hinkle. 2. Agenda Item 16.....F, October City Manager's Conference was added to the August 9, 1982 City Council Agenda. COUNCILMAN SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 9~ 1982 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. . COUNCILMAN TOTH' SECONDED' THE' MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0. 3. Minutes COUNCILMAN TOTHMOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 19TH, 1982 CITY' COUNCIL MEETING. COUNCILMAN SCHULDT' SECONDED' THE' MOTION ~ . . THE' MOTION. PASSED 3-0 . 4. Open Mike Mr. Bob Fritz appeared before the City Council regarding the refund of the assess- ments paid in the Peterson Addition and the interest rate proposed to be paid on the assessments. The City Administrator indicated that it was the City Attorney's opinion that the City of Elk River is allowed to pay six (6) percent on the over- payment of the assessments from the time of receipt of payment to the time the judgement was handed down, and eleven percent from the time of the judgement to the time the refund is actually made. Mr. Bob Fritz indicated that his attorney is in disagreement with the City's Attorney and further indicated that he felt the eleven (11) percent should be paid from the time of the overpayment of the assessment. Mr. Bob Fritz further indicated that he would request his attorney to pursue the matter in court. Councilman Schuldt indicated that he felt the City must follow the City Attorney's advice and that Mr. Fritz had the right to do a, he so chooses. Mayor Hinkle in- dicated that he felt the City of Elk River must follow the City Attorney's advice. 5. 1982 Sealc6at Program I The City Administrator indicated that $37,500 h~s been allocated for seal coat work in the 1982 budget and further indicated that t~at amount should enable the City to sealcoat between five and six miles of City str~ets. The City Administrator in- dicated that Mr. Ken Nelson, Street superintendi. t, and the City Administrator have prepared a list of specific streets which are r commended for sealcoat in 1982. General discussion was carried on regarding the list of streets suggested and those recommended for sealcoating. I Councilman Toth suggested that Gates not be inclluded on the sealcoat program and fur- ther suggested that the street superintendent rjieW the streets in Elk Hills. Mayor