04-19-1982 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

April 19, 1982 City Council Minutes Page Six title to the property. Mr. Maue explained that he has spent $1,800 in attorney fees to solve his title problem with the property. Mr. Maue indicated that there is a $28,0000 judgement against the property and further indicated that he has $25,000 tied into the property right now. Mr. Maue indicated that there are problems with the survey and the title to the property. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Maue has been granted one extension and should Mr. Maue prove to the City Council that he has problems with obtaining clear title and is pur- suing the solution of those problems, the City Council could extend the conditional. use permit for another periOd, due to extenuating circumstances of the title prob- lem. Mr. Maue again explained the cost he has already has into the property and the solving of the title problem. COUNCILMAN ENGSTROM MOVED TO EXTEND THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MR. MAX MAUE FOR A TEMPORARY TRAILER AT 19215 TYLER STREET TO JUNE 30, 1982. COUNCILMAN SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-0. 12. Peterson Addition Reassessment Procedure The City Administrator indicated that City staff was researching the costs attri- butable to the road and the crossing so that an appropriate amount can be deter- mined to be assessed to the benefited area and then to the City has a whole for the balance. The City Administrator further indicated that the next step in the process would be the notification of the County Auditor to no longer collect asses- sments from the individuals originally assessed, and then at the May 3rd City Coun- cil meeting, a proposed assessment roll and area would be presented to the City Council with the public hearing to assess the cost.associated with the rail cross- ing to be scheduled for June 7, 1982. Mayor Hinkle asked at what time would the City stop collection of the assessments. The City Administrator indicated that upon determining the appropriate amount to be assessed, the City could then notify the County Auditor to stop collection of assessments originally assessed. Mr. Bob Fritz indicated that he did not agree with the City Administrator's pro- posal for the recommended process for the Peterson Addition reassessment. Mr. Fritz indicated that in the conclusion of facts from Judge Dablo, the costs were specified; specifically, $57,870.95 for the signals and a total cost of $71,000.95. Mr. Bob Fritz indicated that the City Council can, by resolution, determine that the City will pay the $57,870.95 and the balance can be assessed. The City Administrator recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution once the exact numbers had been determined. Councilman Toth suggested that the Mayor contact the City Attorney regarding the numbers to be used in the resolution. The City Administrator indicated that Judge Dablo's order does not contain the costs for the rail signals and the cr~ssings and that the numbers are in the findings of fact. General discussion was carried on between Mr. Fritz, the City Administrator and the City Council regarding the process to follow for the reassessing procedures. Mayor Hinkle suggested that the City authorize the County Auditor to stop the