My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-30-2018 CCM SPECIAL
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
04-30-2018 CCM SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2018 9:46:17 AM
Creation date
5/8/2018 9:46:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
4/30/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 4 <br />April 30,2018 <br />• Franchise fees <br />■ Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) <br />Mission Statement <br />Mr. Portner returned to the Mission Statement discussion. <br />Councilmember Wagner asked if Elk River was ready to stop being referred to as a <br />"bedroom community" (a city where citizens own a home but work, shop, and recreate <br />in a different city). She asked if the list of comparably -sized cities presented during the <br />financing section would consider themselves to be bedroom communities. <br />Councilmember Westgaard added Elk River used to have a vision and mission as a <br />manufacturing hub to attract companies and employers. He added people change jobs <br />more frequently than they move, contributing to the concept of living and working in <br />two different communities. <br />Councilmember Wagner proposed the following mission statement: <br />Where Council and Staff work with citizens to develop a sustainable and prosperous <br />community for all to live, work, and play and to appropriately govern in an ever <br />changing environment. <br />Mayor Dietz suggested council take some time to look over the statement and offer any <br />changes, questions, or suggestions at a later meeting. <br />Sustainability <br />Mr. Pormer asked council to consider and explore building a sustainable plan to undo or <br />get around impending challenges of the near future. <br />Council proposed the following options for developing sustainable funding: <br />• Sinking fund — money from NSC growth <br />• Service Levels — GF Budget <br />• Bonding <br />• LOST <br />• User fees <br />• Tax Increment Financing (TIF)/Abatement <br />■ Get out of funds (GRE, Landfill) <br />• Asset inventory with peer comparisons — Divest quality vs. quantity <br />• Look at asset management partners with shared facilities <br />Councilmember Ovall expressed there seemed to be too many parks that are not <br />developed and other cities seem to focus on enhancing signature parks. <br />Councilmember Olsen countered it seemed past decision makers wished to have parks <br />within walking distance of neighborhoods. Many park lands developed out of remnants <br />of land that couldn't be developed for other uses. Maybe in the future, the city should be <br />more intentional about picking park lands. <br />IO11Arl or <br />hIATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.