Laserfiche WebLink
(2 Cv l ti4,7 .1 <br /> • prior to voicing their opinion on the issue. He <br /> further suggested that the Council consider <br /> different methods of assessment . <br /> 8 . Janet Kotter, 19192 Tyler Street, indicated she is <br /> opposed to the extension of services . She further <br /> questioned what restrictions would be placed on <br /> her land if she were in the urban service district <br /> and if the expansion of the district would affect <br /> the value of her land. <br /> 9 . George Deschenes, Twin Lakes Road, indicated his <br /> concern of utilities being developer driven to a <br /> certain area. He suggested that no development be <br /> allowed until services are extended from the core <br /> outward. <br /> 10 . Dennis Chuba, 10451 175th Avenue NW, discussed the <br /> issue of allowing property owners that are in the <br /> urban service district to subdivide their <br /> property. <br /> 411 11 . Roger McAlpine, Twin Lakes Road, indicated he was <br /> opposed to the expansion of the district and <br /> further indicated his concern regarding the cost <br /> for sewer and water. He suggested that this <br /> decision be based on a vote by the public . <br /> 12 . Stan Chase, 16800 Highway 10, questioned what the <br /> procedure was for voicing an opinion regarding the <br /> urban service district. <br /> 13 . Kathy Specht, suggested that the Council speak <br /> into the microphones and that there be a <br /> microphone available for each person at the front <br /> table. <br /> 14 . Tim Schneider, 17119 Highway 10, indicated he was <br /> not opposed to the extension of the urban service <br /> district, but that he was opposed to the high cost <br /> to the residents . He further questioned why the <br /> Planning Commission recommended expanding the <br /> urban service area from what the Steering <br /> Committee recommended. <br /> • 15 . Steve Bradford, Fillmore Street, indicated he was <br />