My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6 & 5.7
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2000
>
02-29-2000
>
5.6 & 5.7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 2:26:07 PM
Creation date
5/7/2018 2:26:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Mt)ing Minutes Page 9 <br /> May 23, 1995 <br /> Terry Maurer, City Engineer, commented on questions and concerns raised the <br /> " public as follows: <br /> Ill <br /> -There is adequate capacity for the sanitary sewer system. A trunk sewer line was <br /> extended north on the railroad alignment to serve Meadowvale School and was <br /> extended northerly to the Meadowvale Heights Addition. Also, the City is in the <br /> process of upgrading the treatment facility to triple its capacity. A development <br /> like this will help pay for it through hookup fees and service. <br /> -Someday the proposed development will be connected to the high level water <br /> service tower behind the new SAX grocery store. He stated that the Elk River <br /> Utilities has indicated they have no plans to put another water tower into service <br /> this area for at least five years. There is no cost to the City for a water tower; it is <br /> paid for by the users in connection fees and user fees. Booster pumping stations <br /> will be built in the development area to provide adequate pressure for service <br /> and fire protection.This cost will be borne by the developer. <br /> -County roads are designed to carry several thousand cars per day. It is <br /> estimated that each lot will generate between 6-8 trips per day. This <br /> development could be estimated to generate between 1,200- 1,600 trips per <br /> day, divided between the two accesses to the development. Less that 1,000 per <br /> trips per day would be added to County Road 77 when fully developed. The <br /> County is aware that they will need to deal with this traffic in the future, and are <br /> discussing signalizing the County Road 1 and County Road 77 intersection. <br /> -The City has the ability to place restrictions on truck traffic routes when reviewing <br /> • gravel mining permits, but this does not control other truck traffic. <br /> -There is no cost to a property to be included in the urban service area. It would <br /> prevent a property owner from further subdividing their property without city <br /> sewer and water. The properties that are not part of this dev- ....-. • . .- <br /> excluded from the urban service •is nct. <br /> -Mailbox locations are determined by the U.S. Post Office and the City has no <br /> control. <br /> -The City may request special enforcement on Proctor to help control the <br /> speeding. <br /> Commissioners Tacheny and Kreger expressed their support for sidewalks in the <br /> development. <br /> Discussion followed regarding location of sidewalks. <br /> Commissioner Kreger suggested that sidewalks be placed adjacent to the curb <br /> on one side of all streets in the development, with the exception of the cul-de- <br /> sacs. <br /> Discussion followed regarding the placement of the retaining wall on lots <br /> abutting the Ridgewood development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.