My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2000
>
02-29-2000
>
5.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2025 10:23:07 AM
Creation date
5/7/2018 2:07:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 4. Review <br /> Original contamination <br /> The city's major concern regarding the landfill was controlling the contamination <br /> generating from that original unlined cell prior to it leaving the boundaries of the site. <br /> Ground water in this area is estimated to be moving approximately 50 feet per year <br /> laterally and the contamination 5 to 25 feet. <br /> The first step in the effort to mitigate the contamination was to define the geo-hydrology <br /> of the area. The glacial deposits and associated stratification of the soils in the area made <br /> this a time consuming and difficult task. This effort has been pretty much complete and <br /> remedial actions (clean-up) has begun. <br /> The current attempt at remedial action is using active gas venting (sucking the gases from <br /> the waste) to remove the volatile organic compounds from the ground water also. The <br /> details of how this is to be accomplished, as well as a contingency plan if it does not <br /> work, are specified in the attached license and conditional use permit. <br /> Approval of cells 14 to 17 <br /> The landfill is divided into cells. Past city reviews included the approval of the cells <br /> through number 13. The Planning Commission and Council typically review and <br /> approve the concept of the cells contingent on staff having the final approval of the <br /> • construction details. Approval of cells 14 through 17, which are consistent with the long- <br /> range plan at the landfill, is part of this current request. These cells, as are all of those <br /> that were constructed after the original cell, are designed with a liner and leachate <br /> collection system to control the escape of contaminates. The stipulation that staff has <br /> final approval of the construction details is contained in the license and conditional use <br /> permit. <br /> Bio-reactor(leachate recirculation) <br /> The landfill is proposing something a little experimental with cells 14 through 17 called <br /> bio-reaction. Instead of the leachate being pumped out of the landfill and taken to a <br /> treatment facility, they are proposing to reintroduce it into the waste through a system of <br /> pipes. <br /> The benefits to the landfill are the waste will be more compressed, leaving them with <br /> more capacity, and they can avoid some of the cost for treating leachate. The benefit to <br /> the environment is a quicker decomposition, and consequently quicker stabilization, of <br /> the waste. There is a concern with the life expectancy of the liner under the waste. <br /> Speeding-up the decomposition process is a good thing. <br /> A number of bio-reactor pilot projects have been tried in Minnesota so that MPCA can <br /> analyze the results. Because of problems, all but three of these have been ordered to <br /> • cease. MPCA appears to be on top of this issue. Staff feels comfortable with MPCA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.