Laserfiche WebLink
TH 10 CORRIDOR STUDY `.. <br /> DRAFT WORK PLAN ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> A. ISSUES <br /> 1. Mobility - Conflict between through traffic and local traffic ID <br /> 2. Proliferation of signals. <br /> 3. Access - Access to local developments <br /> 4. Development - Coordination of land use and transportation decisions <br /> 5. Safety -Number and severity of vehicle crashes <br /> B. STUDY OBJECTIVES <br /> 1. To develop a common vision for TH 10 <br /> 2. To determine the safest access points on TH 10 between Becker and Elk River. <br /> 3. To determine a plan for local frontage/backage roads, where needed. <br /> 4. To coordinate the TH 10 access with existing and future land use. <br /> 5. To coordinate the TH 10 access with local transportation plans. <br /> 6. To coordinate the TH 10 access with district and state transportation plans. <br /> 7. To develop an implementation plan which has the support of area citizens, businesses and <br /> elected officials. <br /> 8. Compatible with other planning efforts, i.e. Northstar Corridor <br /> C. GOALS <br /> 1. Manage access <br /> 2. Improve safety between Becker and Elk River <br /> 3. Improve mobility <br /> D. DATA COLLECTION/ANALYSIS • <br /> 1. Traffic data <br /> a. Historical traffic counts <br /> b. Traffic projections <br /> c. Crash rates <br /> d. Crash clusters <br /> e. Crash type <br /> f. Rail crossing issues <br /> 2. Land use <br /> a. Existing <br /> b. Projected <br /> 3. Transportation plans <br /> a. Local <br /> b. District and State <br /> c. Functional classification <br /> E. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION <br /> 1. TH 10 Corridor Committee <br /> 2. Public meetings <br /> F. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> 1. Transportation infrastructure • <br /> 2. Planning and zoning <br /> G. RECOMMENDATIONS AND TIME LINE FOR LMPLEMENTATION <br />