My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.14 & 5.15
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2001
>
02-27-2001
>
5.14 & 5.15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 11:28:23 AM
Creation date
5/7/2018 11:28:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
02/23/01 FRI 16:00 FAX FAX LC7000 [ 002 <br /> DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP <br /> MINNEAPOLIS PILLSBURY CENTER SOUTH BILLINGS <br /> NEW YORK 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET GREAT FALLS <br /> SEATTLE MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55402-1498 MISSOULA <br /> DENVER TELEPHONE: (612) 340-2600 BRUSSELS <br /> WASHINGTON,D.C. FAX: (612) 340-2868 .. FARGO <br /> DBS MOINES HONG KONG <br /> ANCHORAGE ROCHESTER <br /> LONDON GREGORY A. FONTAINE SALT LAKE CITY <br /> COSTA MESA (612)340-8729 VANCOUVER. <br /> FAX(612)340-2807 <br /> fo ntaine.gregna"d o rseylaw.c o m <br /> February 23, 2001 <br /> Peter Beck, Esq. <br /> Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett <br /> 3400 City Center <br /> 33 South Sixth Street <br /> Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br /> • Dear Peter: <br /> As we discussed, Cargill, Incorporated envisions amendments to the City of Elk River <br /> zoning code that would create a fair amount of certainty with respect to the nature of the <br /> regulatory review applicable to company's activities at the Animal Nutrition Center (ANC). The <br /> company is open to a number of different approaches, but believes essentially that only those <br /> activities with significant potential impacts should be regulated as conditional uses. Moreover, <br /> most of Cargill's ANC activities should be regulated as permitted uses in an agricultural research <br /> district, in our view, because these uses are consistent with long-term practices and do not <br /> significantly impact any neighboring properties. We also recognize that there may be some <br /> activities that fall between these two broad use categories. <br /> With those concepts in mind, the lists below provide some specifics with respect to the <br /> nature of regulation that the company believes appropriate in the context of the current <br /> settlement discussions. We look forward to feedback from you and the City. <br /> Permitted Uses <br /> 1. R& D facilities <br /> 2. Laboratory <br /> 3. Product and process development facilities(a/k/a pilot plant) <br /> 4. Greenhouse <br /> • 5. Nutrient Management <br /> 6. Crop Production <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.