My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.3
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2001
>
02-13-2001
>
3.3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 11:08:29 AM
Creation date
5/7/2018 11:08:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Planning Commission/OA 01-01 <br /> February 13, 2001 <br /> Page 3 <br /> • The ordinance could also be amended to eliminate the cluster option in the <br /> Al district. This would limit open space development to the RI District south <br /> of County Road 33. <br /> Quality of open space <br /> One way to preserve higher quality open space would be to include a certain <br /> percentage of"buildable area" as open space. Buildable area is defined as <br /> gross land area less the land that includes floodways, hydric and restrictive <br /> soils, lands with slopes greater than 33%, wetlands, and areas that can not <br /> accommodate septic systems. Currently the percent of open space is based <br /> on "eligible land". Eligible land includes all land except type 3, 4 and 5 <br /> wetlands, street right-of-way and areas occupied by streams, rivers or lakes. <br /> Eligible land is much less restrictive than buildable land. <br /> When determining percentage of open space at least a certain percentage <br /> (25% -50%) of the total open space must be buildable area, the remaining <br /> could be eligible land. The ordinance could also be amended to give the City <br /> the option of requiring that shoreland and areas along streams be included as <br /> preserved open space. <br /> Architectural Theme <br /> • <br /> We need to better define what type of standards the city would like included <br /> as architectural themes. As an example of what other developments are <br /> doing, I have attached the design standards for a cluster development in <br /> Stillwater called "Liberty on the Lake". Another method to address the issue of <br /> architectural standards is to make them a requirement and eliminate them as <br /> an optional bonus feature. <br /> Front Yard Setback <br /> This issue is related to the architectural theme. Often, when designing open <br /> space developments, a pedestrian friendly environment is desired. This can <br /> be made more difficult with the standard 30 foot front yard setback, which is <br /> what is currently required in our ordinance. In order to allow more flexibility <br /> and allow for additional tree preservation, the front yard setback could be <br /> reduced to 20 feet. This would bring the house closer to the street while still <br /> allowing adequate space for off street parking. <br /> Density Bonus Calculations <br /> It is currently not clear how the 5% density bonus should be calculated, <br /> whether it is based on zoning district density or the open space density. The <br /> • <br /> S:\PLANNING\SCOTT\OA0101.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.