My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.6 - 6.9
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2000-2005
>
2001
>
06-26-2001
>
6.6 - 6.9
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2018 9:40:47 AM
Creation date
5/7/2018 9:40:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• used, and it is often so unattractive in its visual impact both (from the perimeter and from its <br /> streetscapes/internal roadways), that multi-family uses create an almost automatic negative <br /> response. <br /> The primary reason to intermix two different building-home types within the same area are <br /> manyfold: <br /> • a mixture of slab on grade buildings, with split entry/level buildings introduces topo <br /> graphic variety, interest, aesthetics. <br /> •The subtle screening for privacy that landscaped slopes and berms can introduce to an <br /> uninteresting one level/slab on grade development <br /> 19. Townhouses: For the row townhomes, their garage court, lined with large, 3 level build- <br /> ings,with tuck-under garages can be our undoing. For this reason, from the outset of planning, <br /> the David Bernard/Rottlund Renaissance development in Minneapolis was the model used for <br /> the site plan and city representations. Their buildings, with the approach to getting residents <br /> upstairs from both front and rear, do much to obscure the fact that buyers have to walk up 15- <br /> 16 risers to get to their living room level. <br /> 20. Our row townhomes must allow guest/resident access from both greenway-streetscape <br /> side and the garage court side,with attractive step and stair combinations, screened and accent- <br /> ed by large tree planting. <br /> • 21. We must do all we can to obscure the rows of garage doors thru overhanging decks, bal- <br /> conies, trellises, appropriate building masses. <br /> 22. We anticipate most guest parking to be parallel parking at streetside and along the greens. <br /> Many residents will do car cleaning, and if we enable it, neighbor within the garage court area. <br /> This is one of the strengths of the Renaissance project building design. <br /> 23. For the back-to-back townhomes, the end elevations must be as attractive as the fronts. On <br /> the plans shown thus far, this is a challenge... given the large, shallow pitch roof that covers the <br /> whole structure width without accent. The patio and entrance fencing/shelters should be inte- <br /> gral to the structure, where detail is "one", with attractive, proportioned building-roof mass- <br /> ing. <br /> 24. For any building type, ideally, all "parts" are unified by a dominant, recognizable architec- <br /> tural style. <br /> 25. Further, the colors selected for the buildings must be done both in the context of the select- <br /> ed architectural styles, as well as the need for the marketing asset of variety. There are more <br /> colors available that beige. <br /> • <br /> May 12,2001 <br /> page 6 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.