My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 PCSR 03-23-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
03-23-1995
>
3 PCSR 03-23-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 1:43:16 PM
Creation date
4/30/2018 1:43:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steering Committee Meeting Minutes Page 5 <br /> March 23, 1995 <br /> III far east the line will be extended. The City will then need to determine how <br /> much of that area will be assessed. Terry explained that the line cannot be sized <br /> smaller to save costs now, and later add property further east. Hank Duitsman <br /> added that the pipe must be oversized now to allow for future expansion. <br /> Chair Minton questioned what the costs would be to serve the area in the 5 year <br /> plan under discussion, compared to what the costs would be to serve the <br /> "ultimate" area. Terry Maurer stated that typically in the past, the City has <br /> carried the cost for serving the ultimate area, so it would be hard to provide a <br /> dollar figure for that difference. Terry explained that in the western area <br /> improvement project, area 1 would have been close to $5,000 per acre, area 2 <br /> would have been somewhat lower, and by the time it was extended all the way <br /> out to area 4 the costs may have been approximately $2,000 per acre, since the <br /> lift station was already in and the pipes are smaller. Terry Maurer stated that the <br /> startup costs will be higher for the East Highway 10 to go through the Mn/DOT <br /> right-of-way highway interchange and UPA property. <br /> CHRIS KREGER MOVED THAT THE STEERING COMMITTEE DESIGNATE AREAS SHOWN <br /> ON THE MAP AS 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, PART OF 11 AND PART OF 12, AND 1 AS THE <br /> EXPANDED URBAN SERVICE DISTRICT FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. <br /> Chris Kreger then proposed that the following motions be made: <br /> MOTION NUMBER 2. THAT THE COMMITTEE APPROVE INCLUDING APPROXIMATELY <br /> ONE-HALF (1/2) OF AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 AS THE EXPANDED SERVICE AREA FOR THE <br /> IIINEXT FIVE TO TEN (5 - 10) YEARS. <br /> MOTION NUMBER 3. THAT THE COMMITTEE CONSIDER THE AREA DESCRIBED ON <br /> THE ATTACHED MAP, FOR THE EXPANDED URBAN SERVICE AREA FOR THE NEXT TEN <br /> TO FIFTEEN (10-15) YEARS. <br /> MOTION NUMBER 4. THAT THE COMMITTEE CONSIDER THE AREA DESCRIBED ON <br /> THE ATTACHED MAP, AS THE EXPANDED SERVICE AREA FOR THE NEXT 15 TO <br /> TWENTY-FIVE (15-25) YEARS. <br /> Hank Duitsman questioned the audience whether or not there was anyone in <br /> the audience that was interested in having sewer and water in the far south east <br /> Highway 10 area of the City. He explained that the City Council needs to know <br /> if this is all the further the sewer is going to go in order to determine the size of <br /> the trunk lines. <br /> Chair Minton noted that the first motion includes Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Brown's <br /> property. Arne Engstrom stated that if Brown's property included he would vote <br /> against the motion. Chris Kreger stated that Area #8 and #11 would most likely <br /> be included and assessed if the City Council voted to extend the sewer and <br /> water. Arne stated that he felt that area should only be included if the property <br /> owners petitioned for sewer and water. Arne continued that it is known that <br /> property owners in Areas 5, 6, 7 and parts of 12 want sewer, but people in Areas <br /> 8 and 11 do not want it. <br /> • Steve Rohlf stated that he was involved in the previous update of the urban <br /> service district in 1990. He stated that the Committee needs to look as far out <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.