My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 PCSR 01-12-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
01-12-1995
>
5 PCSR 01-12-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 1:21:20 PM
Creation date
4/30/2018 1:21:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
South Fork Apartments <br /> This area has newly constructed apartment buildings through a tax increment financing project. It is located near <br /> •the commercial area of I-35 and Hwy. 50 and provides a critical customer base for that commercial area. These are <br /> nicely landscaped and maintained buildings. There are a large number of families living here while waiting for their <br /> homes to be built. <br /> Zoning: R-7 Average Property Taxes: $1,109 <br /> School District: Lakeville Avg. # Children per Unit: .62 <br /> Avg. Market Value: S27,916 Avg. # People per Unit: 2.33 <br /> Average Unit Age: 4 Years <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> South Fork Apartments Addition turns an overall negative fiscal impact for the City and the school district. It is <br /> mainly serviced by the I-35 and Hwy. 50 business area and the Burnsville Center area. When the tax increment <br /> financing is not calculated into the revenues, this addition has a significantly smaller negative impact(almost none) <br /> to the City. However, there is an overall negative impact to the school district. This TIF is approximately 20 years <br /> in duration. <br /> ISOUTH FORK APARTMENTS (All Phases) l <br /> J <br /> pz Annual Operating City School <br /> tv Figures District <br /> `�� `` r+ :, 7 . Expenditures $144 663 <br /> " �, $792, 144 <br /> - �x;, 4z" } ', Revenues 112, 698 613, 931 <br /> r#r. 7 <br /> la - , Net Impact (31 965) (128,213) <br /> �` <br /> 3 I ' # ��- , - <br /> 3 � Overall Net (160, 178) <br /> �V <br /> • _"`..Y. Per Acre Impact (924) l (3,706)�, i f'4:. i" � + �r, „ wr r ; <br /> `, :.;� »� ::`"e i ,� „ ;„ Overall Net per (4 629 <br /> ......ems ,^ %,„...,.4' . raj Acre ) <br /> Reference Appendix C for fiscal impact without TIF <br /> FINDINGS: <br /> Despite high concentration, the tax increment financing burdens City finances. The City should keep in mind, <br /> however, that this area has contributed significantly to the success of the commercial area at Interstate 35 and <br /> Highway 50. The losses in South Fork should be compared to the positive fiscal impact of the commercial <br /> development. These areas fiscally balance each other. Tax increment financing generally should only be used for <br /> ,struction of municipal infrastructure, such as roads, senior centers, etc. Overall site quality is exemplary. <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.