My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 PCSR 01-12-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
01-12-1995
>
5 PCSR 01-12-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 1:21:20 PM
Creation date
4/30/2018 1:21:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 6 <br /> SEXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> In 1991, the State Legislature changed the tax laws which froze the City levy limits and decreased <br /> future property tax revenue. Lakeville needed to take action. On July 15, 1991, Lakeville's City <br /> Council passed an interim ordinance which temporarily prohibits approval of new residential plats <br /> and expansion or development of mobile(manufactured) home parks. This ordinance essentially <br /> provides the City with a time-out to develop a means of managing growth in a fiscally responsible <br /> manner. This fiscal impact study is the first action directed by the Council under the interim <br /> ordinance. The results of this study will be used as a base to develop impact fees. <br /> Fiscal impact analysis compares revenues and expenditures of various types of development to <br /> arrive at an overall net impact. There was little factual data on what residential developments <br /> actually contribute and cost the City's finances. In order to provide better fiscal impact data, a <br /> number of sites were selected to represent various housing types and market values. The revenues <br /> generated from property tax and intergovernmental aid are compared against expenditures on a per- <br /> erson, per-acre or per-unit basis, in order to arrive at a net fiscal impact. Additionally,we <br /> conducted a focus group with department heads to provide context and a broader perspective. <br /> Also, we analyzed current service standards and new tax laws in order to provide an information <br /> base for the next phase of the growth study. <br /> As probably expected, lower value homes tended to have a negative fiscal impact. The high value <br /> homes had positive fiscal impacts. Senior housing, when not constructed with tax increment <br /> financing, produces a net positive fiscal impact. In general, the higher the density of housing the <br /> more the return, however, there are diminishing returns after a certain point in market value and <br /> density. Twinhomes, quads, townhomes and high value homes provide the best fiscal investment in <br /> housing. <br /> The scattered development puts an enormous strain on the City's operating and capital budgets and <br /> negatively impacts commercial areas trying to establish service areas. The 3600 lots that are in line <br /> for development will act to randomly fill in the northern part of the City. Future planning should <br /> be done in contiguous patterns. <br /> Increasingly, City efforts will need to focus on redevelopment as the City ages. Mobile homes and <br /> areas with aged housing stock, in particular, are major concerns of the Council and City staff. This <br /> study finds that these areas have a significant negative fiscal impact. Remedies include focusing on <br /> crime prevention and property maintenance. <br /> Overall, the moratorium and subsequent growth studies emphasize prudent City management. The <br /> City needs to be involved with other municipalities, counties and school districts in order to <br /> coordinate growth in an environment of constrained resources. A Dakota County effort to conduct <br /> similar studies is highly encouraged, because many cities would benefit. <br /> • <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.