My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda 10-27-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1994
>
10-27-1994
>
Agenda 10-27-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 12:36:30 PM
Creation date
4/30/2018 12:36:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steering Committee Minutes Page 3 <br /> October 27, 1994 <br /> need for buffering. He pointed out that there is flood plain area which will need <br /> to be considered with development proposals. <br /> Discussion followed regarding the extension of Waco to intersect with Highway <br /> 10. Hank Duitsman stated that Mn/DOT has recommended a floodable bridge to <br /> cross the Elk River. <br /> Tom Hartman, 18675 Macon Street, suggested that the Committee consider <br /> commercial development only one tier deep for the area north of Highway 10 <br /> (across from the Courthouse) with the balance used for residential development. <br /> Sarah Hartman, 18675 Macon Street, questioned what the standard depth would <br /> be for commercial development. Hank Duitsman stated that the Committee <br /> must evaluate the depth of commercial if it occurs along Highway 10. <br /> David Raymond, 13686 Riverview Drive, stated that he did not feel it was a good <br /> idea to have residential along the highway or along a highway frontage road. <br /> He suggested the area be for a "business park" use, with the property along the <br /> river used for some type of public park. <br /> Tom Hartman stated that he felt the best use of the area would be residential <br /> and a buffer from the highway could be constructed. <br /> Marly Glines noted that the only type of commercial that would fit would be <br /> some type of strip center. <br /> • A short discussion followed regarding the value of the land as commercial vs. <br /> residential. <br /> Barb Miracle stated that as a property owner, she would not want to be backed <br /> up to a commercial area. <br /> Steve Ach explained that there is a large right-of-way along Highway 10 which <br /> would create a type of buffer in terms of distance if the property would be <br /> developed as residential, and also, that berming and landscaping could also be <br /> used for buffering. He stated that there are many different types of buffering <br /> that can be instituted to separate residential, commercial and industrial land <br /> uses. <br /> Hank Duitsman questioned the audience whether or not they felt evergreens are <br /> an effective buffer. Tom Hartman stated that he did not feel they are effective. <br /> Mike Boelter, 13325 207th Avenue NW, owner of property north of Highway 10, <br /> stated that his driveway is over 600 feet long and he can easily hear the traffic <br /> from Highway 10. <br /> David Raymond stated that he is aware of studies regarding sound barrier walls <br /> which indicate they are only effective noise abatement for property immediately <br /> adjacent to highways, and the sound is merely deflected to areas farther away. <br /> He stated that berms and plantings are more effective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.