Laserfiche WebLink
gigFEISteering Committee Minutes August 25, 1994 <br /> • should be set aside now for industrial, rather than trying to put it next to homes <br /> that are already there. <br /> Committee Member Pat Dwyer noted that the City Council recently adopted a <br /> business park zone in order to provide an area for light industrial development. <br /> Marlon Glines stated that townships just outside of the Elk River area with 21/2 acre <br /> minimum lot sizes are developing at quite a fast pace. He questioned the <br /> residents present whether or not they would be in favor of a lot size of two and <br /> one-half acres if there were no adverse effects on the farmers. A majority of the <br /> people were in favor of this concept. He stated that it has been his experience <br /> that it is possible to have larger lots mixed with smaller lots when development <br /> occurs. He stated that an older home can be remodeled to fit in with new <br /> housing to look like it belongs there. Manly also explained how lots can be <br /> subdivided with a sewer and water overlay, placing a home on the property in <br /> such a way that it can be subdivided later if sewer and water is extended. <br /> A resident asked that the Council take into consideration those residents like <br /> himself who bought ten acres because that is what they wanted, and do not <br /> want to see it changed. <br /> Dick Hinkle explained that when he served on the Anoka Board of Realtors, the <br /> Met Council tried to enforce a 10 acre minimum on local government and HUD <br /> refused to finance anything less than 10 acres in that area. He stated that they <br /> when to Washington D.C. to fight the restriction and won because it wasn't <br /> • legal. <br /> Jerry Jackson, resident on 200th Avenue N.W., expressed his view that he receives <br /> no benefits living in Elk River. <br /> Committee Member Arne Engstrom stated that the County Board voted to open <br /> development to two and one-half acre lots. This does not mean there cannot be <br /> larger lots, only a minimum of two and one-half acres. <br /> Cecilia Scheel agreed with Arne Engstrom that people want to be able to <br /> develop their property if they wish. <br /> Cindy Lowe, resident in Greenhead Acres, expressed her opinion that she would <br /> like to see the lot size remain at 10 acres. She stated that she has a four acre lot <br /> and does not want to receive a huge assessment at some point in the future for <br /> improvements. <br /> Chris Kreger stated that the closer a resident lives to the urban service area, the <br /> sooner those services may come to them. He stated that he sympathized with <br /> residents who purchased 10 acres assuming that it would remain that way, but <br /> they needed to take into consideration that an adjoining neighbor may have an <br /> entirely different opinion. Mr. Kreger stated that it is the Committee's responsibility <br /> to collect the opinions and facts that relate to the area being discussed and then <br /> to determine what is the general feeling of the public. He stated that the <br /> committee will do their best to develop a compromise to satisfy both sides of the <br /> • issue. <br />