Laserfiche WebLink
� f <br /> M St <br /> • Howard R. Green Company <br /> MN MI= <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS Formerly MSA <br /> January 21, 1998 Consulting Engineers <br /> File: 802810j-0240 <br /> Mr. Steve Ach <br /> City Planner <br /> City of Elk River <br /> 13065 Orono Parkway <br /> P.O. Box 490 <br /> Elk River, MN 55330-0490 <br /> RE: WINDSOR WOODS ADDITION <br /> Dear Mr. Ach: <br /> As you requested, we have reviewed the package submitted for the Windsor Woods <br /> development. The package consisted of a Development Plan dated January 13, 1998; a <br /> Preliminary Grading Plan with a revision date of January 14, 1998; Preliminary Road Grades <br /> dated December 23, 1997; and a set of storm drainage calculations. All of the plans and the <br /> storm drainage calculations were prepared by John Oliver&Associates. Based on our review <br /> of this information, comments received at the staff review meeting, and a discussion that was <br /> • <br /> held with the Developer and his engineer, we would offer the following comments: <br /> 1. The same issue that makes this an attractive piece of property to develop makes it a <br /> difficult piece of property to develop. Outside of the wetlands on the property, it is <br /> heavily wooded and hilly terrain. The road alignment through the site is generally at the <br /> peak of the terrain. We have looked carefully at alternatives to this road alignment and <br /> would conclude that this is probably the best location for the road. It does, however, <br /> pose some potential problems with a grade over 7% facing north. This has the potential <br /> of creating an icy situation in the winter months. The grade does, however, meet the <br /> City ordinance. Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, have relatively steep slopes off of the road and <br /> are shown to be graded with unique driveways to try to minimize the driveway grade to <br /> their home site. One alternative that could be considered would be to have the driveway <br /> to Lot 4, Block 1, cut the corner of Lot 3, Block 1, to give it as flat a slope as possible, <br /> and then have Lot 5, Block 1, tie into the driveway of Lot 6, Block 1. This would <br /> preserve the relatively steep wooded side slope along the frontage of Lots 4, 5, and 6, <br /> Block 1. It would, however, cause potential problems with the shared driveway between <br /> Lots 5 and 6, Block 1. <br /> 2. Lot 9, Block 1, and Lots 10 and 11, Block 2, are shown to have smaller house pads <br /> because of the relatively steep terrain that the pad is built on. Special attention will have <br /> to be paid throughout this plat to specify the type of house and the location for the house <br /> pad. This is not typically done in a rural plat. Typically, in a rural plat there are assumed <br /> to be many options, given the size of the lot, for the home location. In this particular plat, <br /> because of the relatively steep grades, the Development Plan will have to be more <br /> IPdetailed and adhered to as far as house type, elevation, and location on the lot. <br /> 1326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 612/644-4389 fax 612/644-9446 toll free 888/368-4389 <br />