My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 12
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1998
>
01-17-1998
>
Item 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 10:47:19 AM
Creation date
4/30/2018 10:47:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 16 <br /> Subdivision regulations govern the size,location,grading <br /> improvements and similar matters when a tract of land under <br /> single ownership is divided into two or more lots when the <br /> creation of streets and other utilities to service future <br /> development is necessary. Subdivision regulations must <br /> require that future development be consistent with zoning <br /> ordinances and may require consistency with the <br /> comprehensive plan. <br /> Minn.Stat.§505.03. Councils have statutory authority to approve subdivision plats. <br /> All plats must receive approval prior to recording them with <br /> the county recorder or registrar of titles.Prior to approval,the <br /> council may employ qualified people to check and verify the <br /> plat to determine its suitability from the community planning <br /> standpoint.The council may require the subdivider to pay for <br /> the costs associated with this verification process. <br /> Minn.Stat.§462.358,subd. The Planning Act sets platting regulations, which the council <br /> 2(b). may adopt. A city may condition subdivision approval upon <br /> the dedication of a"reasonable portion"of the subdivision for <br /> public streets, sewer,electric,gas,drainage and water <br /> facilities.Another option is for the city to require a payment in <br /> lieu of such dedication.The payment would be a cash <br /> equivalent for parks,open space or wetlands. <br /> • <br /> Collis v.City of Bloomington Traditionally,dedications of land in Minnesota were upheld if <br /> 310 Minn.5,246 N.W.2d 19 a reasonable relationship existed between the need for the land <br /> (1976). <br /> and the proposed development.Usually,this meant that the <br /> city would have to show that the land was needed because of <br /> the population increase brought about by the subdivision.As <br /> discussed in the previous section,dedications are now subject <br /> to scrutiny under the rough proportionality test formulated by <br /> the U.S. Supreme Court in the Nollan case.Cities should <br /> continue to give careful consideration to the conditions placed <br /> in subdivisions. <br /> Minn.Stat.§462.358,subd.2b Requiring an equivalent amount in cash,based on the fair <br /> (this statute would likely be market value of the undeveloped land, is also permitted. Any <br /> upheld as constitutional as it <br /> seems to meet the Nollan test). payments the city receives must be deposited into a special <br /> fund to acquire land for parks,playgrounds,public open space, <br /> storm water holding areas or ponds,developments or existing <br /> areas,and debt retirement for any land previously acquired by <br /> the city for such public purposes. <br /> • <br /> 393 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.