My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1997
>
11-25-1997
>
5.5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2018 10:17:19 AM
Creation date
4/30/2018 10:17:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the Planning Commission/OA 97-15 <br /> November 25, 1997 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • There is also a difference in architectural standards for accessory structures <br /> between property within the urban service area and property outside the <br /> urban service area. Metal buildings are allowed in the Rla and Al districts <br /> as long as it is painted so it is compatible with the existing home. Metal <br /> buildings are not allowed in the Rib, Ric, Rld and Rle districts. <br /> Overview <br /> The different standards applicable to lots within the urban service area and <br /> those outside the urban service has been an issue with residents that own <br /> large lots within the urban service area. Under the current ordinance, a <br /> resident owning 20 acres of land within the urban service area could only <br /> have 1200 square feet of accessory building area. However, if that same <br /> property was outside the service area they could have 4,500 square feet of <br /> accessory building area. The larger lot could easily accommodate more than <br /> 1200 square feet of accessory building area, but simply because it is within <br /> the urban service area it is not allowed. <br /> As the urban service area has expanded to the east, farmers, whose property <br /> is located within the urban service area but is still being actively farmed, are <br /> impacted. The farmer, if he exceeds 1200 square feet of accessory building <br /> area, would not be able to construct the necessary outbuildings needed to <br /> IIsustain a profitable farm. <br /> In order to address the problems associated accessory structures on larger <br /> lots within the urban service area, staff is suggesting an ordinance <br /> amendment. This amendment would allow larger lots, 5 acres or larger in <br /> size, located within the urban service area to have accessory structures <br /> based on the same standards as property located in the Rla and Al districts. <br /> For instance, a 5 acre lot in the Rib district would be allowed 3000 square <br /> feet of accessory building area, same as in the Rla district. Lots less than 5 <br /> acres would be allowed 1200 square feet, same as the current requirement. <br /> Five acres was picked as a cutoff point because that is the minimum size lot <br /> needed for agricultural uses in the urban service area. The architectural <br /> standards applicable in the Rla and Al districts would also apply to lots <br /> within the urban service area 5 acres and larger. <br /> Recommendation <br /> It is recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of <br /> Ordinance No. 97- amending the Zoning Code to allow lots in the <br /> urban service district, 5 acres and larger, to have accessory structures based <br /> on the same scale as the Rla and A-1 districts. <br /> • <br /> \\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\scott\oa97-15.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.