Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />February 27, 1984 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />indicated that the Coca Cola Corporation stock was not used in any way for the <br />promotion of the product and was in fact, a payment to Mr. Dahlberg after ful- <br />filling certain obligations. The City Administrator indicated that those <br />certain obligations were accomplished in the City's store on City time, with <br />City resources. The City Administrator indicated that the public places a <br />certain trust in public employees to perform their duties for a designated <br />salary and not to .accept any other payment or gratuity from outside sources <br />which may affect the decision-making process of that public employee. The City <br />Administrator indicated that the loss of public trust in City government is <br />an extremely serious reprecussionfrom the type of actions demonstrated by Mr. <br />Dahlberg. The City Administrator indicated that the City's position regarding <br />the. severity of Mr. Dahlberg's acceptance of the Coca Cola stock has also been <br />upheld by the Unemployment Insurance Division of the Minnesota Department of <br />Economic Security. <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that in the investigation regarding the Coca <br />Cola Corporation stock, it became apparent that significant amounts of pro- <br />motional merchandise has been delivered to the Elk River municipal liquor store <br />and has been taken home by Mr. Dahlberg for his personal use and consumption. <br />The City Administrator indicated that over the period from November 1982 until <br />early July 1983, a list of merchandise that Mr. Dahlberg took home for his <br />personal use and consumption was made, and the value of the merchandise was <br />estimated at over one thousand dollars. The City Administrator further indicated <br />that the supporting employees' statements indicated that this pattern of taking <br />home promotional merchandise taken home by Mr. Dahlberg is several thousands <br />of dollars. The City Administrator cited two items of particular importance <br />that Mr. Dahlberg accepted and took home; one, a Weber kettle barbecue grill, <br />the second, a small television set. The City Administrator indicated that the <br />barbecue grill was intended for promotional use, but was never used in the <br />store. The City Administrator further indicated that the television set was <br />part of a promotion offered to customers through a drawing. The City Administrator <br />indicated that the television set was won through the drawing by Mr. Jim Thielke <br />and when the television set was delivered to the store, Mr. Dahlberg took it home <br />and refused to return it. <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that employees have received caps and T-shirts <br />which do not have a dollar volume and in fact, create employee morale and good <br />will toward the City. The City Administrator further indicated that employees re- <br />ceiving caps or T-shirts are not in the position of making management decisions. <br />The City Administrator indicated that the items as outlined in his memorandum to <br />the Mayor and City Council dated February 24, 1984, require serious consideration <br />of the ability of Mr. Dahlberg to continue to function effectively as the liquor <br />store manager. The City Administrator indicated that Mr. Dahlberg's actions <br />have eliminated trust by the City Administrator, the City staff and potentially, <br />the public and therefore, it is recommended that the City Council uphold Mr. <br />Dahlberg's suspension without pay and further, based upon the findings as stated, <br />dismiss Mr. Dahlberg as manager of the Elk River municipal store effective <br />immediately. <br /> <br />Mr. Lais, Attorney representing Mr. Dahlberg, <br />requesting a Veteran's Preference hearing and <br />to the atlegations of the City Administrator. <br />David Dahlberg did not know the City's policy <br />Coca Cola stock. <br /> <br />indicated that they would be <br />would then express their response <br />Mr. Lais indicated that Mr. <br />regarding the acceptance of the <br />